Category: Corona Virus

Page 49«..1020..48495051..6070..»

VDH: COVID cases and hospitalizations fall 20 percent – Vermont Biz

January 27, 2024

by Timothy McQuiston, Vermont Business Magazine COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations fell last week after a long period of edging higher since last summer. Cases and hospitalizations were both down about 20 percent from the week. Hospitalizations are about what they were last winter. Fatalities have not seen a related spike nor decline. There were 6 deaths reported by the Vermont Department of Health last week and 6 the week before, for a pandemic total now of 1,100 as of January 13, 2024 (the most recent data available). Deaths have been running at about that level for several months.

The VDH reported January 17, 2024, that COVID-19 hospitalizations were down 9 last week to a statewide total of 50. COVID-19 activity remains in the "Low" range, according to the VDH. Reported cases last week were 365, down 90 for the week.

VDH reported 15 COVID-related deaths in March, 20 in April, 10 in May, 10 in June (these are fewest since the summer of 2021), 11 in July, 15 in August, 17 in September, 25 in October, 19 in November and 15 in December and 5 so far in January 2024 (there were 33 in October 2022 and 47 in October 2021 and zero in October 2020, which was the last month since the beginning of the pandemic to record no COVID-related fatalities).

Of the total deaths to date, 884 have been of Vermonters 70 or older. There have been 3 deaths of Vermonters under 30 since the beginning of the pandemic.

CDC states that already an estimated 97% of Americans have some level of immunity, from either vaccination or infection or both, which they said will help keep down new transmission and lessen serious outcomes.

New COVID-19 variant JN.1: Experts explain symptoms, how to spot and treat the new strain

(see data below)

Report Timeframe: January 7 to January 13, 2024

The hospitalizations dataset contains day-level data reported from all Vermont hospitals each Tuesday. Reported numbers are subject to correction.

The number of reportable COVID-19 cases is still available in this report, below. Laboratory-confirmed and diagnosed COVID-19 cases and COVID-19 outbreaks must still be reported to the Vermont Department of Health.

There were 3 outbreaks last week, 2 at schools, and 1 at long-term care facilities (LTC). There were 10 outbreaks the week before.

Vermont Department of Health recommendations: Preventing COVID-19 (healthvermont.gov)

Vermont has the second lowest fatality rate in the US (127.3 per 100K; Hawaii 102.2/100K). Mississippi (439/100K) and Oklahoma (436.7/100K) have the highest rates. The US average is 292.8/100K (CDC data).

There has been a total of 1,169,666 COVID-related deaths to date in the US (CDC) and 7,012,986 globally (WHO).

Following an analysis of COVID-19 data, the VDH reported in January 2023 a cumulative 86 additional COVID-associated deaths that occurred over the course of the pandemic but had not been previously reported. Most of those deaths occurred in 2022.

COVID-19 Update for the United States

Early Indicators

Test Positivity

% Test Positivity

11.8%

(January 7 to January 13, 2024)

Trend in % Test Positivity

-1% in most recent week

Emergency Department Visits

% Diagnosed as COVID-19

2.5%

(January 7 to January 13, 2024)

Trend in % Emergency Department Visits

-19% in most recent week

These early indicators represent a portion of national COVID-19 tests and emergency department visits. Wastewater information also provides early indicators of spread.

Severity Indicators

Hospitalizations

Hospital Admissions

32,861

(January 7 to January 13, 2024)

Trend in Hospital Admissions

-9.6% in most recent week

Deaths

% of All Deaths in U.S. Due to COVID-19

4.3%

(January 7 to January 13, 2024)

Trend in % COVID-19 Deaths

+10.3% in most recent week

Total Hospitalizations

6,727,163

CDC | Test Positivity data through: January 13, 2024; Emergency Department Visit data through: January 13, 2024; Hospitalization data through: January 13, 2024; Death data through: January 13, 2024. Posted: January 22, 2024 3:33 PM ET

The Delta variant took off in August 2021, which resulted in the heaviest number of deaths before vaccines and their boosters helped alleviate serious COVID cases. Multiple Omicron variants are now circulating and appear more virulent than previous variants, but perhaps not more dangerous, according to the CDC.

AP April 5, 2023: WHO downgrades COVID pandemic, says it's no longer a global health emergency

Walk-in vaccination clinics run by the state closed on January 31, 2023. Learn more

Vermonters are reminded that all state COVID testing sites were closed as of June 25, 2022. PCR and take-home tests are available through doctors' offices, pharmacies and via mail from the federal government. The federal government officially ended its pandemic response as of May 11, 2023. See more information BELOW or here: https://www.healthvermont.gov/covid-19/testing.

Starting May 11, 2023, the CDC and Vermont Department of Health will no longer use the COVID-19 Community Level to measure COVID-19 activity in the U.S. and Vermont. Instead, Vermont's statewide COVID-19 level will be measured by the rate of COVID-19 in people being admitted to the hospital, per 100,000 residents.

Focusing on hospitalization data is a better estimate of how COVID-19 is impacting the community now that reported COVID-19 cases represent a smaller proportion of actual infections. This also allows us to compare Vermonts hospitalization levels with other parts of the country.

The Delta variant caused a surge in COVID-related fatalities last fall and into the winter.

The highest concentration of deaths was from September 2021 through February 2022. Overall, December 2020 and January 2022 were the worst months with 72 fatalities each.

The US confirmed its first case of COVID-19 on January 20, 2020.

Vermonters ages 6 months and older are eligible for COVID-19 vaccines. Getting vaccinated against COVID-19 is the safer way to build protection from serious illnesseven for those who have already had COVID-19. Learn more about COVID-19 vaccines (CDC)

COVID-19 vaccines are free and widely available. Anyone can get vaccinated in Vermont, including those who live in another state, are non-U.S. citizens, or who have no insurance. See Vermont's current vaccine rates

Know your rights when getting free vaccines.

You are considered up-to-date if you are over the age of 6 years old and have received a bivalent (updated) COVID-19 vaccine.Learn more about kid vaccines

If you are unable or choose not to get a recommended bivalent mRNA vaccine, you will be up to date if you received the Novavax COVID-19 vaccine doses approved for your age group.

Find more on recommended doses from CDC

COVID Vaccine Information for Health Care Professionals

More on COVID-19 Vaccines (CDC)

Recommended COVID Vaccine Doses (CDC)

Find a COVID-19 vaccine near you.

Image

Use Vaccines.gov to find a location near you, then call or visit the location's website to make an appointment.

Vaccines.gov

Everyone 6 months of age and older is eligible to get a COVID-19 vaccination.Most children are also now eligible for a bivalent dose that offers increased protection against the original strain and omicron variants.

See more on recommended vaccine doses by age group (CDC)

Resources for parents and caregivers

Confident Care for Kids

Tips for Helping Kids Feel Ready for Any Vaccine (Vermont Family Network)

#factsheet

What Families with Children Should Know About COVID-19 Vaccines (translated)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWcqHOgQIVg&t=5s

Conversations About COVID-19 Vaccines for Children with Vermont Pediatricians (American Academy of Pediatrics)

If you cannot get vaccines through any of the options above, our local health offices

offer immunization clinics by appointment.

Need a ride? If you do not have transportation to get a free COVID-19 vaccine or booster, please contact your local public transportation provider or callVermont Public Transportation Association (VPTA)

at 833-387-7200.

English language learners, or immigrant or refugee community members, who would like to learn about more about vaccine clinics can contact theAssociation of Africans Living in Vermont

(AALV) at 802-985-3106.

If you lost your vaccine card or your information is wrong:

Recommendations for keeping your vaccination card and record up to date

Find more COVID-19 translations

COVID-19 resources for people who are deaf and hard of hearing

Report your COVID-19 test results

Link:

VDH: COVID cases and hospitalizations fall 20 percent - Vermont Biz

High risks for adverse outcomes linked to COVID-19 with omicron variant at delivery – Healio

January 27, 2024

January 23, 2024

2 min read

Add topic to email alerts

Receive an email when new articles are posted on

Back to Healio

Risks for adverse outcomes associated with COVID-19 at delivery stayed high during the omicron variant window, despite possible immunity from previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccination or testing differences, researchers reported.

If you are pregnant or planning pregnancy, it is important to stay up to date with COVID-19 vaccinations to reduce the risk of getting very sick and experiencing problems from COVID-19 and to protect the health of your baby, Jeffrey Carlson, PhD, an epidemiologist at the CDCs National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, told Healio. Although studies have suggested less severe outcomes during omicron compared to prior variant periods, the risk of complications for pregnant women with COVID-19 remained elevated during the omicron period compared with pregnant women without COVID-19.

Carlson and colleagues conducted a cross-sectional observational study assessing data from 2,990,973 U.S. women with delivery hospitalizations from the Premier Healthcare Database from February 2020 to August 2023. Researchers categorized February 2020 to June 2021 as the pre-delta period, July to December 2021 as the delta period and January 2022 to August 2023 as the omicron period. COVID-19 exposure was identified via diagnostic code during delivery hospitalization.

Overall, 1.9% of women in the study had COVID-19 at delivery hospital admission discharge. Of these, 20,031 women had COVID-19 at delivery during the pre-delta period, 10,534 during the delta period and 26,053 during the omicron period.

Compared with pregnant women without COVID-19, those with COVID-19 had significantly higher prevalence of adverse maternal and pregnancy outcomes during delivery across all variant periods, according to researchers.

Women with COVID-19 at delivery during the omicron period had significantly increased risks for maternal sepsis (0.4% vs. 0.1%; adjusted prevalence ratio = 3.32; 95% CI, 2.7-4.08), acute respiratory distress syndrome (0.6% vs. 0.1%; aPR = 6.19; 95% CI, 5.26-7.29), shock (0.2% vs. 0.1%; aPR = 2.14; 95% CI, 1.62-2.84), renal failure (0.5% vs. 0.2%; aPR = 2.08; 95% CI, 1.73-2.49), ICU admission (2.7% vs. 1.7%; aPR = 1.64; 95% CI, 1.52-1.77), mechanical ventilation (0.3% vs. 0.1%; aPR = 3.15; 95% CI, 2.52-3.93), in-hospital mortality (0.03% vs. 0.01%; aPR = 5; 95% CI, 2.3-10.9), stillbirth (0.7% vs. 0.6%; aPR = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.01-1.36) and preterm delivery (12.3% vs. 9.6%; aPR = 1.28; 95% CI, 1.24-1.33) in adjusted models compared with women without COVID-19.

These data only included COVID-19 infections at delivery, so more information is needed about the potential impacts of COVID-19 infections earlier in pregnancy, Carlson said. These findings underscore the importance of continued surveillance, research and monitoring of maternal, pregnancy and infant outcomes as new variants emerge.

Collapse

Disclosures: Carlson reports having previously owned Moderna stock. Please see the study for all other authors relevant financial disclosures.

Add topic to email alerts

Receive an email when new articles are posted on

Back to Healio

Go here to see the original:

High risks for adverse outcomes linked to COVID-19 with omicron variant at delivery - Healio

Long COVID’s impact on cardiovascular health: what we do and do not know – News-Medical.Net

January 27, 2024

In a recent study published in Nature Cardiovascular Research, researchers review the cardiovascular effects of long coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Post-COVID-19, which is also referred to as long COVID and post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC), is a novel condition affecting 10-60% of COVID-19 survivors, which amounts to 70-420 million individuals throughout the world. Long COVID is characterized by the persistence or, in some cases, development of novel symptoms following recovery from COVID-19.

The World Health Organization (WHO) and United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimate that long COVID symptoms can persist for months or even years following initial infection recovery, thereby resulting in significant loss of quality of life (QoL) for affected individuals.

Since 2020, over 23,000 publications on long COVID have been released. Despite the increased focus on the prevalence and definition of the condition, some studies have aimed to understand the pathophysiology and underlying mechanisms of the disease, with the shared aim of discovering a cure.

Significant progress notwithstanding, a targeted treatment for long COVID remains elusive. Thus, synthesizing the rapid scientific progress in post-COVID-19 research will both highlight recent advances and underscore critical gaps in the literature.

Despite being a predominantly respiratory condition, a growing body of evidence reports the systemic effects of COVID-19. This feature is shared by long COVID, with over 20 symptoms identified to date across respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological, gastrointestinal, and endocrine systems. Common nonspecific complaints include dizziness, fatigue, and memory loss.

Due in part to the novelty of the condition, clinical diagnostic tests for post-COVID-19 syndrome remain theoretical. As a result, the National Institutes of Health Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) Initiative 12-symptom checklist is the current gold standard in long COVID diagnosis.

Recent cardiovascular-focused research has devised cardiovascular-centric guidelines, including the American College of Cardiology practice guideline document.

Although the cardiovascular complications of the post-COVID-19 condition are highly publicized, the sequelae from this virus are not particularly unique. Cardiovascular effects including myocarditis have been long described following other viral illnesses such as influenza and Epstein-Barr virus. However, the mortality rate and incidence of vascular complications is far greater in COVID-19."

Long COVID is confirmed through various clinical tests including complete blood counts, basic metabolic panel, troponin, C-reactive protein, and pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and echocardiograms. In severe cases, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and chest X-rays may be used.

Long COVID-associated cardiovascular pathophysiology can be classified as immune dysregulation and inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, microvascular injury, and neurological signaling dysfunction. Two main long COVID phenotypes have been identified, of which include overt cardiovascular disease after COVID-19 (PASC-CVD) and those with cardiovascular symptoms despite lacking clear disease markers (PASC-CVS).

PASC-CVD patients are often older and are at an increased risk of endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, and microvascular injury. Comparatively, PASC-CVS patients are typically younger and at a greater risk of neurological signal dysfunction and immune dysregulation.

The mechanisms responsible for the cardiovascular effects of long-COVID can be immediate through direct cytotoxic injury or delayed, which is attributed to a cascade of immune-overstimulation-mediated responses.

Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) is one of the most commonly researched cardiovascular symptoms and is characterized by a sudden increase in one's heart rate when transitioning between sitting, lying down, and standing. POTS was identified at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, with the highest prevalence in the PASC-CVS phenotype.

The most common test for POTS is a head-up tilt-table test (HUTT); however, several studies have found that many POTS patients remain undetected by HUTT. As a result, POTS prevalence estimates may be severe underestimates.

Myocardial injury is another common characteristic of post-COVID-19, which, unlike POTS, has clear biomarker evidence of its prevalence through the troponin test. Myocardial injury is also much better characterized, as it arises both from general critical illness outcomes of acute COVID-19 like hypoxemia and shock, as well as from cardiac structural pathology.

Recent studies have elucidated the role of COVID-19 in causing myocardial injury through hypercoagulability. Subsequently, myocardial injury increases the risk of heart failure and myocarditis.

Arrhythmias, or irregular heartbeat, have been identified through their comorbidities, including inflammatory cytokine release, myocardial scarring and fibrosis, persistent immune dysfunction, and potential gap junction dysfunction.

While no curative therapies for long COVID have been identified, long COVID cardiovascular symptoms can be managed on a symptom-by-symptom basis. These interventions are often based on routine cardiovascular care with generally beneficial outcomes.

Advances in post-COVID-19 diagnostic tests, which are currently under development, must be fine-tuned to better inform policymakers and clinicians. Additional progress is also needed to identify long COVID-associated cardiovascular risk factors. The development of novel therapeutic interventions to treat the entire condition of long COVID is also crucial, rather than managing each of its numerous symptoms individually.

Large-scale longitudinal studies are needed to better understand the medium-term and long-term implications of the post-COVID-19 condition."

Journal reference:

See the original post:

Long COVID's impact on cardiovascular health: what we do and do not know - News-Medical.Net

Continuing to learn about coronaviruses – UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health

January 27, 2024

January 26, 2024

By Audrey Smith

Ralph S. Baric, PhD, began studying coronaviruses decades before the COVID-19 pandemic hit. There is still much to learn about this family of viruses, and the Baric Lab remains among the worlds leaders in coronavirus research, exploring questions like Where did COVID-19 originate? and developing treatments for future coronaviruses.

Baric, who is the William R. Kenan, Jr. Distinguished Professor of epidemiology at the UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, was senior author on two recent coronavirus research papers. The first, published in the journal Nature Microbiology, investigated a pangolin SARS-CoV-2-like virus, including its biological capabilities, ability to elicit an immune response and ability to transmit between species. The second, published in the journal Science Translational Medicine, sought to identify broad therapeutics that can treat future outbreaks of MERS-CoV (the coronavirus that causes Middle East respiratory syndrome) and other similar coronaviruses.

Our understanding of the way that animal coronaviruses spill into human populations is incomplete and only partially understood. Some researchers have always argued that the SARS-CoV-2 virus which causes COVID-19 began in bats and then was transmitted to a key intermediate host species, where strains of the virus circulate and mutate, allowing it to be transmitted to humans. In this theory, the intermediate reservoir host species, in which the virus circulated freely and evolved, was critical to explaining how viruses spread into human populations. Yet, a reservoir species with a circulating virus has not been discovered.

Baric and team, however, believed that some zoonotic SARS-like viruses have the intrinsic properties necessary to replicate and transmit easily between multiple mammalian host species, eliminating the need for a reservoir species.

In the paper recently published in Nature Microbiology, Baric and team examined whether the SARS-like coronavirus found in pangolins, small mammals that are often called scaly anteaters, carries these intrinsic properties. The pangolin coronavirus is closely related to SARS-CoV-2, but it has never infected people.

Dr. Ralph Baric

We want to understand how viruses move between species because this information helps to establish research priorities that are designed to protect global health, Baric said. For example, this information can identify hosts and environments that inadvertently promote virus jumping between species, providing us with the knowledge to identify and regulate high-risk environments, like open markets in dense population centers. The information helps to minimize the threat potential by informing the development and testing of diagnostics that can find early cases, and identifying broadly acting countermeasures that are effective. As a consequence, both the public health and medical communities will be positioned to rapidly implement intervention and treatment strategies in an emerging outbreak setting, saving lives.

The team reconstructed the pangolin coronavirus using the genome length sequences for pangolin coronaviruses that had been reported in previous studies. The studies were performed under stringent containment conditions in the laboratory, and the pangolin virus was found to efficiently use the same receptor protein from more than 20 species of mammals, including pangolins, humans, mice and hamsters. They also found that the virus grew at similar numbers as SARS-CoV-2, it could naturally be transmitted between hamsters, and it was killed by the existing monoclonal antibodies, antiviral drugs and vaccines that target the original SARS-CoV-2 strain.

As the virus could transmit between non-reservoir hosts, the data argues that a reservoir species is unnecessary and that some SARS-like animal viruses have the intrinsic capabilities to infect and transmit naturally across multiple species without setting up a large reservoir. SARS-CoV-2 also readily transmitted between deer, mink and humans. This intrinsic capability to transmit across species potentially explains how SARS-CoV-2 emerged to cause the COVID-19 pandemic and why researchers have yet to identify this hypothetical reservoir host.

Most United States citizens think that the COVID-19 pandemic is over and done, but we disagree, said Baric. Our data suggests that zoonotic coronavirus emergence events will accelerate throughout this century and that we need to remain aware and prepared with things like state-of-the-art diagnostic tests, global surveillance systems in place to catch these events early, and a supply of broadly effective antiviral drugs and vaccines to protect the public.

Over 1 million people died before the first countermeasure was available to treat COVID-19. To save lives during future coronavirus outbreaks, broad-based drugs and vaccines capable of providing an immediately available treatment are needed for global health preparedness.

In a paper recently published in Science Translational Medicine, Baric and team were the first to study the bat coronavirus BtCoV-422, which is similar to MERS-CoV. MERS-CoV is a coronavirus that emerged in 2012, causes Middle East respiratory syndrome, has a 35% mortality rate in humans and is still circulating at low levels in the Middle East and East Africa.

The team investigated whether antibodies that neutralize MERS-CoV and antivirals that inhibit SARS-CoV-2 would provide effective treatment strategies against this important group of MERS-like viruses.

The team analyzed the potential range of hosts that the MERS-like BtCoV-422 virus could infect by investigating its ability to use DPP4 entry receptors from multiple species, including humans, and its reliance on external proteases. The MERS-like virus was found to have broad host range potential, and BtCoV-422 replicated efficiently in multiple primary human cells, including airway epithelia, lung fibroblasts and lung endothelial cells. The data also indicated that BtCoV-422 has crossed multiple barriers that typically impede coronavirus emergence potential in humans, such as infectivity in human cells and the efficient use of human entry receptors. However, the virus has reduced growth potential in the human upper respiratory tract, which suggests that further mutations would be required for this virus to threaten human populations.

The researchers then tested current therapeutic countermeasures, including drugs, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and vaccine-elicited murine serum, and structurally characterized a group 2c CoV (also known as betacoronavirus) broadly cross-reactive epitope, all with the hope of informing future coronavirus global health preparedness strategies. Importantly, several SARS-CoV-2 drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and one highly potent MERS-CoV human monoclonal antibody, JC57-11, potently neutralized BtCoV-422, providing ready countermeasures for future use. The virus replication was also potently inhibited by antivirals such as remdesivir and nirmatrelvir. This means that multiple therapeutics that have already been approved for use against SARS-CoV-2 by the FDA are ready for immediate testing against MERS-related viruses, providing several different and immediate treatment strategies for patients in an outbreak setting.

The teams findings also support the hypothesis that these drugs should be evaluated in the context of early treatments for MERS-CoV infection. If approved, these drugs would be valuable tools to treat people experiencing new SARS- and MERS-like coronavirus infections.

Its vitally important that we have broad therapeutics immediately available to treat new emerging viruses, said Baric. We had done extensive studies that had shown that both remdesivir and molnupiravir were highly potent broad-spectrum coronavirus drugs, years prior to the emergence of COVID-19. In fact, thats why these drugs were so quickly approved for human use. We know that there will be other zoonotic coronaviruses that infect and emerge to cause serious diseases in human populations and we need multiple broad-based drugs that can be accessed immediately if were going to protect the health of future populations. We also need effective policies that control ecologic settings for zoonotic virus emergence, like closing open markets and preventing the illegal trade of wildlife.

Importantly, MERS-422 and the pangolin SARS-like coronavirus are being used to demonstrate the performance and breadth of broadly protective vaccines that protect against zoonotic, epidemic and pandemic SARS and MERS-related viruses that threaten human populations. The teams ongoing studies have already contributed to the development of pan-coronavirus vaccine products that are moving toward human clinical research studies.

Contact the UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health communications team at sphcomm@unc.edu.

See original here:

Continuing to learn about coronaviruses - UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health

Latest global COVID snapshot shows rising cases, drop in deaths – University of Minnesota Twin Cities

January 27, 2024

Over the past month, global COVID-19 cases rose slightly, with a steady drop in deaths from the virus, the World Health Organization (WHO) said in its latest monthly update.

However, the group cautioned about interpreting the data, given that less than half of countries reported their COVID metrics during the latest reporting period, which covers December 11, 2023, to January 7.

"According to estimates obtained from wastewater surveillance, clinical detection of cases underestimates the real burden from 2 to 19-fold," the WHO said.

In the final week of 2023, the JN.1 variant made up 65.5% of sequences, up sharply from 24.8% the month before.

In its analysis of regional trends, the WHO said cases rose in two regions. Numbers were up sharply in the South East Asia region, with a more modest increase in the Western Pacific region. In South East Asia, countries reporting some of the highest increases were India and Indonesia. JN.1, part of the BA.2.86 family, became dominant in India in the first week of January.

Meanwhile, in the Western Pacific region, Malaysia and Singapore reported the biggest case rises. Information on Malaysia's health ministry website show that cases in the current wave peaked just before Christmas and are declining steadily. Singapore's health ministry data show a similar pattern.

Deaths declined or remained stable across five of WHO's regions, with only South East Asia reporting a rise, which was sharp. The region's highest numbers were from India, Indonesia, and Thailand.

The WHO closely monitors hospitalizations and intensive care unit (ICU) indicators to look for any changes in illness severity. Very few countries regularly report their hospitalizations and ICU admissions for COVID. Of 22 countries that do, 36% saw a 20% or more rise in hospitalizations over the past month, which included Indonesia, Malta, Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia, Greece, Singapore, the United States, and Ireland.

And of 18 countries regularly reporting ICU data, 44% reflected a rise of 20% or more in admissions for COVID. They include Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Estonia, Ireland, the Netherlands, Greece, and the Czech Republic.

As part of severity monitoring, the group also tracks ICU-to-hospitalization and death-to-hospitalization ratios, which it said are still subject to the same incomplete reporting constraints. The WHO said ICU-to-hospitalization ratios have been decreasing since the peak in July 2021, with a stable trend in recent weeks.

The death-to-hospitalization ratio has also been declining since July 2021, and since January 2023 has remained under 0.15. "This is an encouraging trend indicating a lower mortality risk among hospitalized individuals," the WHO said. It said multiple factors may be responsible, including infection- or vaccine-derived immunity, earlier diagnosis and treatment, and reduced strain on health systems.

Also, the WHO included a caveat that it's not possible to saybased on ratio tracking-if the newer SARS-CoV-2 variants are less virulent.

Here is the original post:

Latest global COVID snapshot shows rising cases, drop in deaths - University of Minnesota Twin Cities

What COVID-19 variants are going around in January 2024? – Nebraska Medicine

January 27, 2024

Get the latest COVID-19 news from infectious diseases expert Mark Rupp, MD, including COVID-19 case rates, types of variants circulating and vaccine updates.

There are currently more than 20,361 patients hospitalized in the United States per week, with 14% of those being ICU patients. The most recent data on the test positivity rate is from the week ending January 13, which was 11.8%. When test positivity is above 5%, transmission is considered uncontrolled.

Since many are using home tests that are not reported through public health or are not testing at all, the official case counts underestimate the actual prevalence of COVID-19.

Currently, the dominant variant nationwide is JN.1, with 61.6% of cases, followed by HV.1, with 14.8% of cases, and JD.1.1, with 4.1% of cases. "The original omicron variant is gone now," says Dr. Rupp. "Currently subvariants of omicron are circulating, including EG.5, XBB.1.16.6, and FL.1.5.1."

In the week ending January 13, 2024, there were 6,638 COVID-19 tests performed in Nebraska, with 767 positive results. This is a 11.6% positivity rate, down 2% from the week prior.

When you receive a COVID-19 test, you won't find out which variant caused your infection. That's because COVID-19 tests only detect the presence of the virus they don't determine the variant.

Genomic sequencing looks at the genetic code of the virus to determine which variant caused the infection.Sequencing results are used by public health experts to understand variant trends in the community.

The best way to prevent new variants is to slow the spread of the virus. The great news is that these proven public health strategies continue to work against new variants as well.

"We have a lot of disease out there. People should continue to be careful," Dr. Rupp says. "Get the bivalent booster, try to avoid high-risk settings. If you can't, then I think you should wear a mask."

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends everyone 6 months and older get updated COVID-19 vaccines this fall.Vaccination remains the best protection against COVID-19-related hospitalization and death.

Our pharmacies offer COVID-19 vaccines on a walk-in basis. View which vaccines are available at each location.

Read more from the original source:

What COVID-19 variants are going around in January 2024? - Nebraska Medicine

Covid-19 and flu cases surge locally, RSV on the decline – Hyde Park Herald

January 27, 2024

Covid-19 and influenza cases are rising in Chicago and around the country, causing some strain on local hospitals.

At the University of Chicago Medical Center, "We've seen a progressive rise over the past two months, with ever increasing cases, both in the clinics, in our employees and in hospitalized patients, said Dr. Emily Landon, the centers executive medical director for infection prevention and control. It was similar to what we were seeing at the peak of last year.

That, plus the patients with flu, its just really rough right now, added Landon, who currently has Covid-19. Landon came down with the sickness despite taking extra precautions for her rheumatoid arthritis, an autoimmune disease.

According to data from the Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH), as expected, test positivity cases began to increase in the fall, from about 6% positivity throughout October to a peak of 12% positivity by the end of December. That same week, about 1,013 people were admitted to the hospital for Covid-19 complications an increase of about 700 people from October.

In the midst of cold and flu season, Covid-19 is leading hospital admissions for respiratory viruses, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Meanwhile, test positivity for Covid-19 cases sits at 8.3% as of Jan. 26. After remaining relatively stable at about 6%, throughout October (up from 2% to 4% over the summer), it started to increase in November. The rate of positive tests peaked the week of Dec. 29, with 12% positivity. (Landon noted that test positivity rate can be unreliable, given that only patients exhibiting respiratory symptoms are tested.)

Regarding patients symptoms, Landon said the hospital is seeing a lot of congestion, lots of sore throats, a lot of co-infection with group A strep, as well as influenza cases.

Were also seeing people who arent testing positive for any of those, and who have just some other virus, making people feel pretty sick and miserable, she added.

According to CDC data, the most prevalent strain of the virus for most of the Midwest is JN.1, a subvariant of Omicron first detected by the World Health Organization in August. It is not said to be any more severe than previous iterations of the virus.

Nearby, Provident Hospital is seeing a similar surge in Covid-19 and flu cases.

This year is the first year in the past few where weve had a true influenza season, said Dr. Jonathan Martin, an infectious disease physician with Cook County Health. Influenza cases have been going up after the holidays.

He added that Provident is also seeing people present with exacerbations of a chronic condition, like asthma or kidney disease.

Per the citys most recent Influenza and Respiratory Virus Weekly Surveillance Report, for the week ending Jan. 13, Chicagos test positivity rate was 9.9%.

Per city reports, more than 20 cases of influenza-associated ICU hospitalizations occurred every week for the last four weeks. Thats more than half of the 174 influenza-associated ICU hospitalizations that have been reported since Oct. 1.

This latest surge, health officials say, is due in part to the low number of vaccinated Americans. Per city data, only 13.8% of Chicagoans have received the most recent booster, which arrived at local pharmacies in September.

The most recent boosters from Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna and Novavax are all expected to help lower the chances of serious illness and hospitalization from JN.1.

CDPH still recommends vaccination as the best way to protect against infection, and encourages all Chicagoans six months and older to get their annual influenza shot and the updated Covid-19 booster.

Landon said that going forward, people should expect to get a new Covid-19 vaccine yearly, like the influenza vaccine.

As for RSV, though the CDPH reports that activity is decreasing, the CDC recommends RSV vaccines for adults ages 60 and older and people who are 32 to 26 weeks pregnant. An RSV-preventative antibody is also recommended for infants and some young children.

Health officials are also urging masking.

I would recommend wearing a mask in public right now for almost anybody, especially if youre a high-risk person, said Landon.

In September, the U. of C. Medicine re-implemented its mask requirement for all health care workers any time theyre interacting with a patient. Its also screening people when they enter the hospital and tracking exposures within the hospital.

Provident is requiring masking of patients and visitors when they enter an exam room or are waiting to be seen by a provider.

"I would recommend if anyone has any questions or concerns if they do have Covid, to go get tested, to wear a mask if they're on their way to be tested and to stay home from work until you feel better, Martin said.

Read the original:

Covid-19 and flu cases surge locally, RSV on the decline - Hyde Park Herald

The association between handgrip strength and functional outcomes in long COVID-19 – News-Medical.Net

January 27, 2024

In a recent longitudinal study published in Scientific Reports, researchers from Brazil investigated the potential association between dynapenia (loss of muscle strength and power) with functional outcomes in patients with long coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

They found that in patients with long COVID, low handgrip strength (HGS) is associated with worse functional outcomes. They further suggested the potential use of low HGS to indicate functional impairment in long COVID patients.

Study:Low handgrip strength is associated with worse functional outcomes in long COVID. Image Credit:Ralf Liebhold/Shutterstock.com

Long COVID, characterized by persistent symptoms after infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-VoV-2), poses a significant public health challenge. Symptoms include post-exertional malaise, fatigue, and neurocognitive and gastrointestinal issues.

The estimated global prevalence of the condition is 43%, with an even higher prevalence in hospitalized individuals. Vulnerable populations, including middle-aged, female, Hispanic/Latino, and economically constrained groups, are at a higher risk of developing the disease.

Despite its impact, long COVID lacks a consensus definition and a standard biomarker or diagnostic tool. This often leads to potential underdiagnosis, particularly in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs).

HGS is an indicator of dynapenia and is shown to be associated with various health outcomes, including cognitive disabilities, bone mineral density, depression, functional health, and mortality. In acute COVID-19, decreased HGS is an independent risk factor.

Using HGS as a simple, low-cost indicator could aid in identifying functional impairment, especially in LMICs lacking complex assessment tools.

Researchers in the present study aimed to investigate if individuals with a persistently low HGS after hospital discharge (following severe COVID-19 in early 2020) showed greater respiratory and functional impairments at 120 days.

The present longitudinal study was conducted at a hospital in Brazil from April to October 2020. It followed unvaccinated, adult COVID-19 patients of both sexes who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) during hospitalization. A total of 113 patients with a mean age of 48 years were included in the study, 54% of whom were female.

At the 120-day (D120) follow-up post-hospitalization, participants underwent assessments including functional capacity test, body composition, HGS, pulmonary function test, and respiratory muscle strength (RMS).

HGS and dynapenia (defined as HGS<30 Kgf for males and<20 Kgf for females) were measured using a hand-held digital dynamometer. Spirometry assessed pulmonary function, and RMS was evaluated with a digital manometer.

Outcomes were measured in terms of forced vital capacity (FEV), forced expiratory capacity at the first second of exhalation (FEV1), maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP), and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP).

Functional capacity was assessed using the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and body composition was determined through bioimpedance analysis.

Data were recorded electronically and analyzed for associations between HGS, respiratory function, and functional capacity. Statistical analysis included the ShapiroWilk test, MannWhitney test, Chi-square test, Spearman's test, and a regression model.

Out of the 113 long COVID patients, 22% exhibited dynapenia at D120 post-acute severe disease. Dynapenic individuals had lower muscle mass, reduced HGS, higher rates of intensive care unit admission and invasive ventilation during hospitalization, and higher BMI.

A greater proportion of dynapenic individuals showed a history of smoking and diabetes. Additionally, muscle mass between day one and D120 of dynapenic individuals was found to be reduced significantly (30.7 kg to 19.9 kg, p<0.001).

Dynapenia was also associated with worse respiratory function (FEV1, FVC, MIP, MEP), significantly diminished walking distance and a lower percentage of predicted walking distance on the 6MWT. Correlation and regression analyses confirmed the association between HGS and functional outcomes, independent of age.

The study's limitations include a relatively small sample size and a short-term follow-up, preventing comprehensive longitudinal comparisons of HGS and other functional outcomes.

Additionally, the single-center design and the specific timeframe of individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2 in the early 2020s may limit the direct applicability of the results to individuals infected with more recent virus variants and with long-term health outcomes.

In conclusion, low HGS in long COVID patients, indicative of dynapenia, is linked to adverse health outcomes such as changes in pulmonary function, respiratory muscle strength, and exercise capacity.

A simple, cost-effective HGS measurement can be a practical biomarker for functional impairment in outpatient and primary care settings.

Recognizing dynapenia's association with in-hospital outcomes months later enables timely patient stratification and risk prevention, potentially reducing comorbidities, delaying functional decline, improving prognosis, and expediting the return to daily activities.

This approach is particularly relevant for LMICs, enhancing healthcare accessibility, facilitating early screening, and managing long-term COVID patients.

Go here to read the rest:

The association between handgrip strength and functional outcomes in long COVID-19 - News-Medical.Net

Study: This protein may be the ‘glue’ that helps COVID virus stick | Tulane University News – Tulane University

January 27, 2024

When SARS-CoV-2 enters the human body, the virus spike protein binds to a cell, allowing the virus to infiltrate and begin replicating.

A new study from Tulane University, conducted in partnership with Florida International University and published in Protein Science, has identified a protein that may be the glue that helps COVIDs spike protein stick.

The study found that a small piece of a proteoglycan called perlecan LG3 a protein most commonly found in blood vessels and the brain readily formed a stable bond with the COVID spike protein and perhaps enhanced the virus ability to bind with cells.

Recent studies have identified proteoglycans as potential key factors in COVID infections. By identifying key interactions between perlecan LG3 and SARS-CoV-2, this study may open the door for new forms of treatment, said co-corresponding author Dr. Gregory Bix, director of Tulane University School of Medicines Clinical Neuroscience Research Center.

The takeaway is this major extracellular matrix proteoglycan found in blood vessels throughout the body most likely plays a significant role in how the virus sticks to and infects cells, said Bix, who has studied perlecan for 25 years as a treatment for cerebrovascular diseases such as stroke and dementia. Perhaps this explains COVIDs impact on the vascular system and the brain, but LG3 seems to act as a sort of bridge for the virus.

Using molecular modeling simulations, the study found that LG3 displayed a high affinity stable interaction with the COVID spike proteins receptor-binding domain, the area that attaches to host cells. This attraction was confirmed using surface plasmon resonance instruments, which use electrons to measure interactions and affinity between molecules.

One prominent type of hydrogen bond found between the COVID spike protein and a host cell only appeared in the study when LG3 was present, suggesting that LG3 may enhance COVIDs ability to bind to a cell.

Further studies are needed to determine if these binding interactions can be affected by mutations in various strains of COVID.

Bix also hopes these findings can lead to new forms of COVID prevention or treatment.

Can decoy pieces of perlecan prevent the virus from binding to cells? Can antibodies block this interaction between LG3 and the spike protein? Theres still so many theories and so much we dont know, Bix said. Continuing to understand how the virus infects cells is critical, especially when you have an ever-evolving virus.

See the original post here:

Study: This protein may be the 'glue' that helps COVID virus stick | Tulane University News - Tulane University

Researchers discover "protective switches" that shield the coronavirus from immune system attacks – News-Medical.Net

January 27, 2024

Over 700 million people were infected and almost seven million died, making SARS-CoV-2 the most devastating pandemic of the 21st century. Vaccines and medication against Covid-19 have been able to mitigate the course of the disease in many people and contain the pandemic. However, the danger of further outbreaks has not been averted. The virus is constantly mutating, which enables it to infect human cells and multiply more and more effectively. In addition, it is developing a variety of strategies against the human immune system in a "molecular arms race". A team led by researchers from the University of Gttingen has now discovered various "protective switches" in the coronavirus that shield it from attacks by the immune system. The results were published in Nature Communications.

The researchers identified two previously unknown chemical protective switches in the virus's main "protease" a crucial protein of the coronavirus. The most important drug against Covid-19, called Paxlovid, targets this protein. The virus uses its main protease to cut out the other virus proteins in our infected cells, thus driving its own replication. It uses the amino acid cysteine to do this. "From a chemical point of view, this could be an Achilles heel for the coronavirus, as cysteines can be destroyed by highly reactive oxygen radicals, which our immune system uses to fight viruses," explains Professor Kai Tittmann, Molecular Enzymology Research Group at Gttingen University, who led and coordinated the study.

The protective switches mean the virus's main protease is protected against the immune system's bombardment by oxygen radicals: the protein is stabilized by one cysteine forming a disulfide with an adjacent cysteine via two sulfur atoms. This prevents the cysteine from being destroyed. At the same time, a bridge known as SONOS connects three parts of the protein between sulfur atoms (S), oxygen atoms (O), and a nitrogen atom (N). This prevents radicals from damaging its three-dimensional structure. Tittmann says: "It is fascinating to see how chemically elegant and effective the coronavirus is in defending itself against the immune system. Interestingly, a coronavirus discovered earlier severe acute respiratory syndrome, also known as SARS-CoV-1 which triggered the 2002 to 2004 outbreak, also has these protective switches. This is the first time this has been shown."

Despite this scientific first, the researchers were not satisfied with just discovering "protective switches". With the chemical blueprint to hand, they set about searching for molecules that can bind precisely to the "protective switches", therefore inhibiting the virus's main protease. They identified such molecules not only in the test tube, but also in infected cells.

This type of molecule opens up the potential for new therapeutic interventions which will stop coronaviruses in their tracks."

Lisa-Marie Funk, first author of the study, Gttingen University's Molecular Enzymology research group

The study was made possible by funding from the Covid-19 Research Network Lower Saxony (COFONI) and the German Research Foundation (DFG). This interdisciplinary study involved researchers from the Faculty of Biology and Psychology, and the Faculty of Chemistry at the University of Gttingen, the University Medical Center Gttingen (UMG), the Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences, the Hannover Medical School and the Universities of Dsseldorf, Hamburg and Lbeck.

Source:

Journal reference:

Funk, L.-M., et al. (2024). Multiple redox switches of the SARS-CoV-2 main protease in vitro provide opportunities for drug design. Nature Communications. doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-44621-0.

More:

Researchers discover "protective switches" that shield the coronavirus from immune system attacks - News-Medical.Net

Page 49«..1020..48495051..6070..»