Category: Covid-19 Vaccine

Page 60«..1020..59606162..7080..»

Quantification of COVID-19 Vaccine Coercion in India: A Survey Study – Cureus

November 13, 2023

Specialty

Please choose I'm not a medical professional. Allergy and Immunology Anatomy Anesthesiology Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery Cardiology Critical Care Dentistry Dermatology Diabetes and Endocrinology Emergency Medicine Epidemiology and Public Health Family Medicine Forensic Medicine Gastroenterology General Practice Genetics Geriatrics Health Policy Hematology HIV/AIDS Hospital-based Medicine I'm not a medical professional. Infectious Disease Integrative/Complementary Medicine Internal Medicine Internal Medicine-Pediatrics Medical Education and Simulation Medical Physics Medical Student Nephrology Neurological Surgery Neurology Nuclear Medicine Nutrition Obstetrics and Gynecology Occupational Health Oncology Ophthalmology Optometry Oral Medicine Orthopaedics Osteopathic Medicine Otolaryngology Pain Management Palliative Care Pathology Pediatrics Pediatric Surgery Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Plastic Surgery Podiatry Preventive Medicine Psychiatry Psychology Pulmonology Radiation Oncology Radiology Rheumatology Substance Use and Addiction Surgery Therapeutics Trauma Urology Miscellaneous

View original post here:

Quantification of COVID-19 Vaccine Coercion in India: A Survey Study - Cureus

Influenza and Up-to-Date COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage – CDC

November 13, 2023

Jeneita Bell, MD1,*; Lu Meng, PhD1,*; Kira Barbre, MPH1,2; Emily Haanschoten, MSPH1,3; Hannah E. Reses, MPH1; Minn Soe, MBBS1; Jonathan Edwards, MStat1; Jason Massey1,4; Gnanendra Reddy Tugu Yagama Reddy, MS1,2; Austin Woods1,4; Matthew J. Stuckey, PhD1; David T. Kuhar, MD1; Kayla Bolden, MPH1,5; Heather Dubendris, MSPH1,3; Emily Wong, MPH1; Theresa Rowe, DO1; Megan C. Lindley, MPH6; Elizabeth J. Kalayil, MPH1,3; Andrea Benin, MD1 (View author affiliations)

What is already known about this topic?

CDC and the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommend that health care personnel (HCP) receive an annual influenza vaccine and stay up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccination.

What is added by this report?

During the 202223 influenza season, influenza vaccination coverage was 81% among HCP at acute care hospitals and 47% among those at nursing homes. Up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination coverage was 17% among HCP at acute care hospitals and 23% among those at nursing homes.

What are the implications for public health practice?

There is a need to promote evidence-based strategies to improve vaccination coverage among HCP. Tailored strategies might be useful to reach all HCP with recommended vaccines to protect them and their patients from vaccine-preventable respiratory diseases.

Views equals page views plus PDF downloads

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends that health care personnel (HCP) receive an annual influenza vaccine and that everyone aged 6 months stay up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccination. Health care facilities report vaccination of HCP against influenza and COVID-19 to CDCs National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). During JanuaryJune 2023, NHSN defined up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination as receipt of a bivalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccine dose or completion of a primary series within the preceding 2 months. This analysis describes influenza and up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination coverage among HCP working in acute care hospitals and nursing homes during the 202223 influenza season (October 1, 2022March 31, 2023). Influenza vaccination coverage was 81.0% among HCP at acute care hospitals and 47.1% among those working at nursing homes. Up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination coverage was 17.2% among HCP working at acute care hospitals and 22.8% among those working at nursing homes. There is a need to promote evidence-based strategies to improve vaccination coverage among HCP. Tailored strategies might also be useful to reach all HCP with recommended vaccines and protect them and their patients from vaccine-preventable respiratory diseases.

Vaccination of health care personnel (HCP) is a critical strategy to minimize transmission of infection in health care settings (1,2). HCP are at high risk for work-related exposure to viruses such as influenza and SARS-CoV-2 but are less likely to transmit these infections when they are vaccinated (3). The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends that HCP receive an annual influenza vaccine (4). ACIP also recommends that persons aged 6 months stay up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccination. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) monitors the implementation of these recommendations by requiring health care facilities such as nursing homes and acute care hospitals to report influenza and COVID-19 vaccination coverage among HCP** to CDCs National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). This study examined influenza and up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination coverage among HCP working in acute care hospitals and nursing homes during the 202223 influenza season.

Acute care hospitals and nursing homes report data to NHSN according to surveillance protocols for influenza and COVID-19 vaccination. Acute care hospitals and nursing homes began reporting COVID-19 vaccination among HCP in 2021; nursing homes were required to report influenza vaccination among HCP for the first time during the 202223 influenza season. To assess influenza vaccination coverage, facilities are required to report an annual count of HCP working in the facility for 1 day during an influenza season (October 1March 31) and the number of HCP who 1) received influenza vaccination, 2) had a medical contraindication to influenza vaccination, 3) declined vaccination, and 4) had unknown vaccination status. The protocol for COVID-19 vaccination coverage includes parallel data fields for COVID-19; however, data collection occurs at a different cadence. Nursing homes and acute care facilities report on schedules mandated by their respective regulatory programs at CMS. Nursing homes submit COVID-19 vaccination coverage weekly; acute care facilities submit 1 week of data per month.*** Both types of facilities report COVID-19 vaccination coverage data among HCP who were eligible to work in the facility 1 day during the reporting week.

To assess HCP vaccination coverage during the 202223 influenza season, analyses were conducted using influenza and up-to-date COVID-19 coverage data (specifically, up-to-date COVID-19 coverage data from the week ending March 26, 2023, or the last submitted week of data) reported to NHSN. NHSN defined up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination as the receipt of a bivalent booster dose or completion of a primary series within the previous 2 months (i.e., not yet eligible to receive a bivalent vaccine). Facilities reporting data for both vaccine types and employing at least five HCP were included in the analysis. Pooled mean influenza and up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination coverage rates were calculated as the number of HCP who had received each recommended vaccine or vaccination series divided by the number of HCP working in all facilities. HCP reported to have a medical contraindication to COVID-19 vaccination were subtracted from the denominator of the up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination coverage calculation, to align with the measure adopted by CMSs quality reporting programs. Coverage with each vaccine was calculated for HCP working at each facility type (nursing home or acute care hospital). Results were further stratified by employment category (employee, licensed practitioner, and student or volunteer); rural-urban classification (rural or urban); county-level social vulnerability index (SVI) tertile****; facility size tertile; state; and U.S. region. Counties in a lower SVI tertile are less socially vulnerable than are those in an upper SVI tertile. All analyses were conducted using SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute). This activity was reviewed by CDC, deemed not research, and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.

Among approximately 8.4 million HCP working in 4,057 acute care hospitals, influenza vaccination coverage was 81.0% overall (Table 1); coverage was lowest (67.2%) among nonemployee licensed practitioners and was substantially higher among employees (83.1%) and nonemployee students and volunteers (85.2%). Among HCP working in acute care hospitals, influenza vaccination coverage was highest in the Midwest (84.7%) and lowest in the Pacific region (74.4%).

Among approximately 2.0 million HCP working in 13,794 nursing homes, influenza vaccination coverage was 47.1% overall; coverage was lowest among employees (46.1%) and substantially higher among nonemployee licensed practitioners (55.3%) and nonemployee students and volunteers (57.7%). Among HCP working in nursing homes, influenza vaccination coverage was highest in the Pacific region (61.1%) and lowest in the South (39.7%). Influenza vaccination coverage among HCP was similar across facility size, urban-rural status, and SVI for both nursing homes and acute care hospitals. Nursing homes in six states reported influenza vaccination coverage of 75% among HCP, whereas this level of coverage was reported in acute care hospitals in 40 states (Figure) (Supplementary Table, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/134928).

Among approximately 7.7 million HCP working in 4,057 acute care hospitals, up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination coverage was 17.2% overall (Table 2) and was highest in the Pacific region (28.9%) and lowest in the Mountain region (9.1%). No substantial differences by staff member type or urbanicity were observed.

Among approximately 1.6 million HCP working at 13,794 nursing homes, up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination coverage was 22.8% overall; coverage was highest among nonemployee licensed practitioners (28.2%) and lowest among employees (22.4%). Among HCP working in nursing homes, up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination coverage was highest among those working in the Pacific region (40.7%) and lowest among those working in the South (17.5%). Up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination was also substantially higher among HCP working at nursing homes in urban (24.2%) than in rural (17.5%) areas. No substantial differences in COVID-19 vaccination coverage among HCP by facility staff size or SVI were observed at either facility type. Up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination coverage was 20% among HCP working in nursing homes in 30 states but among HCP in acute care hospitals, approximately one half as many states (16) achieved this level of coverage (Supplementary Table, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/134928).

During the 202223 influenza season, fewer than one quarter of HCP working in acute care hospitals and nursing homes were up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccination, and fewer than one half of HCP working in nursing homes had received influenza vaccine. Coverage varied by geographic region, health care facility type, employment category, and urbanicity. Recent reports indicate that influenza and COVID-19 vaccination coverage among HCP has declined during the COVID-19 pandemic (5). During the 201718 and 201819 influenza seasons, influenza vaccination coverage among HCP in acute care hospitals was 88.6% and 90.0%, respectively (6). From November 2021 to June 2023, CMS required all HCP at CMS-certified facilities to be vaccinated for COVID-19*****; this requirement likely contributed to COVID-19 primary series vaccination coverage reaching 94.3% among HCP in nursing homes (7) and 91.2% among those at acute care hospitals (5). The current findings suggest that factors associated with low vaccination coverage might have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic and compounded by emerging concerns such as vaccine fatigue (8) and other as yet unidentified factors.

In this analysis, up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination coverage was higher among HCP working in nursing homes than among those working in acute care hospitals. CMS requires nursing homes to report weekly up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination status among HCP and publishes weekly results on a public-facing website; this might have resulted in higher coverage among HCP in nursing homes. CDC also worked with nursing homes to facilitate access to vaccination for both patients and staff members, which might have also improved coverage.

This report identified low up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination coverage among HCP in both acute care hospitals and nursing homes and low influenza vaccination coverage among HCP in nursing homes, both important threats to patient health and safety that need to be addressed. Implementation of vaccination recommendations for HCP has been a long-standing challenge for the public health and health care sectors. In an effort to improve vaccination coverage among HCP, health care facilities and federal and state governments have implemented interventions including jurisdiction-wide and facility-wide vaccination mandates (7,9). Mandates for HCP to receive influenza vaccination have been in place since before the COVID-19 pandemic and might contribute to the high vaccination rates reported to NHSN. However, such mandates might not be easily enforceable among nonemployee HCP in acute care hospitals, among whom coverage with both vaccines was lower than that among employees. Compared to influenza vaccines, COVID-19 vaccines are newer, and availability can be more sporadic; therefore, facilities do not have as much experience promoting vaccination and might not have the ability to conduct mass vaccination events. This might have contributed to lower COVID-19 vaccination coverage. Further, given the variations in vaccination coverage by region and urbanicity, campaign strategies tailored by region and focusing on rural areas might have the potential to increase vaccination coverage.

The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First, influenza vaccination and up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination coverage rates were reported separately using different definitions of total HCP working within the facility. Whether the same personnel are represented in seasonal influenza vaccination coverage counts and weekly COVID-19 vaccination counts is unknown. This nuance limits the direct comparability of coverage with the two vaccines; therefore, statistical comparisons of vaccination coverage were not conducted. Second, this report includes data reported by facilities on behalf of HCP, which could have resulted in underestimates of vaccination acquired outside the health care facility, particularly by HCP not employed directly by the reporting facility. Third, vaccination coverage could not be stratified by recent history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. CDC recommendations state that persons may consider delaying an updated vaccine by 3 months after infection. Therefore, some persons might not have considered themselves eligible for vaccination, leading to an underestimate of COVID-19 vaccination coverage. Finally, this analysis was conducted using aggregate data reported to NHSN at the facility level. Therefore, vaccination coverage could not be stratified by person-level covariates that might have enabled an assessment of potential differences, such as age, race, and ethnicity.

Closely monitoring influenza and up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination coverage among HCP might help facilitate evaluation of effective implementation of vaccination promotion strategies. Studies are needed to identify additional factors associated with low vaccination coverage and approaches to improve coverage among HCP, with particular attention to geographic region, health care facility type, and employment category. Understanding these factors and promoting evidence-based strategies to increase vaccination coverage among HCP, such as making vaccines free and accessible at work (10), might allow for targeted interventions to improve coverage during future respiratory virus seasons. HCP should receive annual influenza vaccines and remain up to date with recommended COVID-19 vaccination to protect themselves and their patients from vaccine-preventable diseases.

1Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC; 2Goldbelt C6, Chesapeake, Virginia; 3Lantana Consulting Group, East Thetford, Vermont; 4Chenega Enterprise Systems & Solutions, LLC, Chesapeake, Virginia; 5CACI International, Inc, Reston, Virginia; 6Immunization Services Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC.

Abbreviation: HCP=health care personnel. * Each facility reported summary influenza vaccination data among HCP working in the facility for 1 day during October 1, 2022March 31, 2023. Up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination coverage was reported to National Healthcare Safety Network each week; data from the week ending March 26, 2023, or the last submitted week of data, were used for analysis. Facility size was calculated separately for acute care hospitals and nursing homes and was based on the tertile distribution of the total number of staff members per facility. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/urban_rural.htm https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/index.html ** South: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia; Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin; Mountain: Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming; Pacific: Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington; Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

* Up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination coverage was defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network during the study period as the receipt of a bivalent booster dose, completion of a primary series, or receipt of a monovalent booster dose within the previous 2 months.

Each facility reported summary influenza vaccination data among health care personnel working in the facility for 1 day during October 1, 2022March 31, 2023. Up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination coverage was reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network each week; data from the week ending March 26, 2023, or the last week of submitted data, were used for analysis.

Abbreviations: HCP=health care personnel. * COVID-19 up-to-date coverage was defined by National Healthcare Safety Network during the study period as the receipt of a bivalent booster dose or completion of a primary series or receipt of a monovalent booster dose within the previous 2 months. Each facility reported summary influenza vaccination data among HCP working in the facility for 1 day during October 1, 2022March 31, 2023. Up-to-date COVID-19 vaccination coverage was reported to National Healthcare Safety Network each week; data from the week ending March 26, 2023, or the last submitted week of data, were used for analysis. Facility size was calculated separately for acute care hospitals and nursing homes and was based on the tertile distribution of the total number of staff members per facility. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/urban_rural.htm ** https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/placeandhealth/svi/index.html South: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia; Midwest: Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin; Mountain: Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming; Pacific: Alaska, California, Hawaii, Oregon, and Washington; Northeast: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Vermont.

Suggested citation for this article: Bell J, Meng L, Barbre K, et al. Influenza and Up-to-Date COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage Among Health Care Personnel National Healthcare Safety Network, United States, 202223 Influenza Season. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023;72:12371243. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7245a5.

MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.

Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.

Original post:

Influenza and Up-to-Date COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage - CDC

James Thorp spreads false claims that COVID-19 vaccines harm fertility, pregnancy, infant survival in The Sentinel … – Health Feedback

November 13, 2023

CLAIM

Americans are dropping dead from COVID-19 vaccines; vaccines impair fertility, pregnancy, infant survival

DETAILS

Flawed reasoning: The claim that COVID-19 vaccines have caused hundreds of thousands of deaths in the U.S. is based on flawed calculations using VAERS death reports, which on their own are insufficient to establish causality. Factually inaccurate: Contrary to Thorps claims, available evidence indicates that COVID-19 vaccines dont harm fertility or increase the risk of pregnancy complications. Inadequate support: While U.S. infant mortality increased in 2022 compared to 2021, respiratory infections and maternal healthcare inequities are much more likely contributors to this trend than COVID-19 vaccines.

KEY TAKE AWAY

Ample evidence from safety surveillance and published studies continue to show that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective, and that their benefits outweigh their risks. The vaccines are also safe before and during pregnancy, and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that people who are pregnant or willing to conceive receive a COVID-19 vaccine.

A Facebook post and a tweet sharing links to Thorps interview were viewed more than 30,000 and 26,000 times, respectively.

COVID-19 vaccine safety has been a central target of misinformation since the beginning of the pandemic. None of these claims is new, and this is also not the first time that Thorp made such claims, which Health Feedback debunked on several occasions.

In Newmans interview, Thorp combined many of the false and unsupported claims he made previously to produce a wider conspiratorial narrative. The interview conveniently concluded with Thorp promoting The Wellness Company, of which he is part of the Chief Medical Team. This company markets supplements that purportedly protect against the spike protein, as well as unproven COVID-19 treatments including ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.

Below, we will analyze the central claims made during the interview in detail.

[P]eople who were just rapidly pushing these things are now dying of strange cardiac events at young ages

Newman introduced the interview with this statement accompanied by a photo of late actor Matthew Perry that he posted on Twitter in May 2021. In it, Perrywho advocated for COVID-19 vaccinationwore a T-shirt with the message Could I be any more vaccinated?, paraphrasing a catchphrase of his character in the popular sitcom Friends.

While Newman didnt explicitly state that it was the COVID-19 vaccine that caused Perrys death, the implication was clear by presenting Perry as an example of vaccinated people dying in supposedly strange circumstances.

Blamingwithout any evidenceCOVID-19 vaccines for celebrities death has become an anti-vaccine trend, and Perry was no exception. However, this theory has no basis in fact, as Poynter and USA TODAY explained.

According to Los Angeles Times, Perry was found dead in a hot tub at his home in Los Angeles on 28 October 2023. Perry had a history of serious health complications, and neither the family nor medical authorities made any statement suggesting a potential link between his death and COVID-19 vaccines.

At the time of writing, the County of Los Angeles Medical Examiner listed the cause of death as Deferred, which means that an autopsy was conducted, but the cause of death is still under investigation. Without knowing the cause of death, any attempt to link Perrys death to COVID-19 vaccines is baseless speculation.

While COVID-19 vaccines have been associated with some serious adverse events, including a few deaths, the belief that any event that occurs following vaccination is necessarily caused by the vaccine is incorrect. Many factors can cause or contribute to increase the risk of a person dying without the need for COVID-19 vaccines playing any role in it, particularly when vaccination hasnt been associated with an increased risk of death, as we will explain below.

Your government and your healthcare systems have killed hundreds of thousands of Americans, probably 350,000 or 400,000 from the vaccine alone

Thorp didnt cite any source to support his claim. However, other frequent spreaders of misinformation have mentioned this exact figure before, suggesting that the claim originates from the same source.

In a Substack article published in October 2022, epidemiologist and former science adviser at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Paul Alexander claimed COVID-19 vaccines caused 350,000 U.S. deaths.

During an Expert Panel Discussion on COVID-19 and Medical Freedom hosted by Pennsylvania State Senator Doug Mastriano in March 2022, entrepreneur Steve Kirsch had also claimed that COVID-19 vaccines had killed 410,000 Americans.

Kirsch and Alexanders figures were both based on death reports recorded in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). According to Kirsch, the number of reports following COVID-19 vaccination was 10,000, while Alexander referred to almost 35,000 deaths. Both argued that deaths were largely underreported. Thus, they multiplied the number of death reports by a factor that supposedly corrected for this underreporting41 in the case of Kirsch and 100 in the case of Alexander. This is how they arrived at their respective estimates of 350,000 (35,000 x 100) and 410,000 (10,000 x 41) deaths.

However, these calculations are incorrect for several reasons, as Health Feedback explained in a review addressing Kirschs claim.

For starters, the VAERS database records any event that occurred following vaccination, regardless of its cause. Therefore, the fact that a death is reported to VAERS doesnt necessarily imply that the vaccine caused it. While VAERS is a helpful tool for identifying unusual patterns that could sign vaccine side effects, determining whether the vaccine caused the event requires much further investigation than just looking at the total number of reports.

In addition, there is no evidence supporting the idea that post-vaccination deaths are vastly underreported as Kirsch and Alexander claimed. COVID-19 vaccines have much stricter reporting requirements compared to previous vaccines, for which only those deaths associated with certain adverse events require reporting. In contrast, healthcare professionals are required to report all deaths occurring after COVID-19 vaccination, even if the cause seems unrelated to the vaccine.

Therefore, the claim that COVID-19 vaccines caused hundreds of thousands of deaths is based on flawed analyses and incorrect assumptions.

This claim is also inconsistent with evidence from published studies, which didnt find that vaccinated people are more likely to die compared to unvaccinated people[1]. On the contrary, COVID-19 vaccines reduce the risk of severe disease, and studies have observed lower mortality rates in vaccinated people compared to unvaccinated people[2,3].

Its proven that the COVID-19 vaccine is declining fertility rates in both male and female

Throughout the entire pandemic, Thorp has been a prominent promotor of the persistent narrative that COVID-19 vaccines impair fertility and pregnancy, which Health Feedback debunked on multiple occasions. During the interview with Rogan, Thorp repeated the same claims, adding that the spike protein is a lethal bioweapon that is hijacking the cellular machinery.

While the virus SARS-CoV-2 does hijack the cell machinery to make more viral particles during infection, this is not how vaccines work.

COVID-19 vaccines instruct cells to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The immune system then recognizes this protein as foreign and learns how to respond to it in the case of future infection. But the protein produced following vaccination isnt produced endlessly in the body. Instead, it is eventually broken down, as any other protein in the body.

Available evidence from safety surveillance and scientific studies show that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and they dont suggest that the small amounts of spike protein induced by vaccination are toxic or harmful.

Contrary to Thorps assertions, there is also no evidence suggesting that COVID-19 vaccines impact fertility in either men or women. Studies show no differences in the ability to conceive between vaccinated and unvaccinated couples[4,5] or between vaccinated and unvaccinated women[6,7].

Researchers also observed no changes in mens sperm quality before and after vaccination[8-10]. In contrast, several studies have reported a decrease in sperm counts and quality following a SARS-CoV-2 infection[11-13].

The effect of COVID-19 vaccines on menstrual cycles has also been evaluated in several large studies[14-16]. The results consistently show a slight increase in cycle length of less than one day. However, cycle length can vary greatly from one person to another, from cycle to cycle, and through life depending on factors such as weight and age. Since changes in cycle length of less than eight days are considered within the normal range of variation, a one-day increase is highly unlikely to have an effect on a persons health.

Infant mortality rate trended up over 3% from the last year for the first time in 20 years; Theyre now pushing four vaccines in pregnancy, this is outrageous, this is why these babies are dying

On 1 November 2023, the U.S. National Vital Statistics System at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) published a rapid release on 2022 infant mortality in the U.S.

CDC estimates showed that infant mortality rose 3%, from 5.44 per 1,000 live births (19,928 infant deaths) in 2021 to 5.6 (20,538 infant deaths) in 2022. This is indeed the first year-to-year increase in the last two decades after a decline of 22% since 2002.

The causes of death that increased the most were maternal complications and bacterial meningitis. Although the report noted an increase in infant mortality across all racial and ethnic groups, this increase was more pronounced in Native Americans. This group, together with Black infants, faced the highest risk, highlighting inequities in maternal healthcare.

Thorp interpreted CDC data as evidence that COVID-19 vaccines cause pregnancy complications that ultimately led to more infants dying.

However, there is no evidence whatsoever that supports this claim. In fact, some of Thorps claims verged on conspiracy theory. For example, he suggested that by recommending COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy, public health authorities deliberately went after women.

First of all, it is important to bear in mind that the CDC data are provisional, so the figures may vary slightly when final data for 2022 becomes available. Danielle Ely, a health statistician and lead author of the report, told Associated Press that researchers still couldnt establish whether the rise was a one-year statistical blip or indicated an actual change in trend.

That said, the data shows a significant and concerning increase in infant mortality. However, theres no scientific basis for attributing this increase to COVID-19 vaccines.

Although the initial vaccine clinical trials didnt evaluate the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant women, later studies showed no safety issues[17-20]. Instead, they observed multiple benefits.

Pregnant women are more likely to develop severe COVID-19 compared to non-pregnant women[21,22]. In turn, having COVID-19 is associated with a higher risk of pregnancy complications, including preterm birth, stillbirth, newborn mortality, and newborn admission to neonatal intensive care[23,24], along with a higher risk of maternal mortality[24].

Therefore, COVID-19 vaccination not only protects pregnant women against illness but also helps improve pregnancy outcomes for both the mother and the baby[25,26]. For this reason, the CDC and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommend that pregnant women get vaccinated against COVID-19.

But what then is the possible cause for the increase in infant mortality?

Eric Eichenwald, a neonatologist at the Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia, explained to STAT News that experts at this point can only speculate as to why a statistic that generally has been falling for decades rose sharply in 2022. But he pointed to the surge of respiratory infections, including flu and Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV), last year as potential contributors to at least part of this increase.

In a statement on the CDCs infant mortality report, March of Dimesa U.S. nonprofit organization that works to improve the health of mothers and infantsalso cited RSV, COVID-19, and flu infections among possible reasons for the increase.

In summary, while it is accurate that the CDC report showed an increase in infant mortality in 2022, no evidence suggests that COVID-19 vaccines contributed to it. Instead, inequities in maternal healthcare and the surge of respiratory infections following the pandemic are much more likely culprits.

My Cycle Story proves theres a shedding event

My Cycle Story, to which Thorp is a contributor, is an online survey that aimed to evaluate the alleged effect of exposure to the spike protein on womens reproductive health.

One of the analyses involved responses on menstrual cycle data from almost 3,500 unvaccinated women with no prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Based on these data, the authors reported that 70% of the respondents had irregular periods after being in close proximity with a vaccinated individual, allegedly suggesting a shedding effect.

In an earlier review covering this analysis, Health Feedback explained that this survey isnt equipped to determine the cause of the observed effects, as the authors acknowledged. Therefore, the analysis alone cant demonstrate that the menstrual irregularities reported are due to shedding from vaccinated individuals and not from other factors.

Newman not only left Thorps claim unchallenged but gave it added emphasis by citing a study by researchers at the University of Colorado, published in ImmunoHorizons in May 2023[27]. This study found that vaccinated people have antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in their nose and mouth that can spread to unvaccinated, uninfected children within the household, likely through respiratory droplets.

Newman misrepresented these results as evidence of vaccine shedding. But Ross Kedl, lead author of the study, told AFP that this phenomenon is unrelated to shedding and that the study was being manipulated for something so far off base.

Indeed, Thorp and Newmans claims are both inaccurate because shedding is a phenomenon that can only occur with vaccines that use live, weakened viruses to generate immunity. Some of these vaccine-derived viruses may still retain the ability to multiply and potentially pass from the vaccinated person to others.

But COVID-19 vaccines dont contain live viruses, only small parts of it that have no capacity to replicate. Therefore, there is no biological mechanism by which COVID-19 vaccines could plausibly cause shedding, as Health Feedback explained in earlier reviews. On the other hand, if confirmed, antibody transfer would prove useful to the recipient host, Kedl said. It is worth noting that the study suggested antibody transfer not only from vaccinated individuals, but also from individuals who had a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Thorps claims linking COVID-19 vaccines with death, infertility, pregnancy complications, and infant survival are based on speculation and flawed analyses. All available evidence continues to show that COVID-19 vaccines protect against severe illness and dont increase the risk of death or cause infertility. COVID-19 vaccines havent been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes but instead they help reduce the risk of pregnancy complications due to COVID-19 infection for both the mother and the baby. Therefore, vaccination is safe and recommended for pregnant women.

The rest is here:

James Thorp spreads false claims that COVID-19 vaccines harm fertility, pregnancy, infant survival in The Sentinel ... - Health Feedback

COVID-19 update 11-07-23 – Suffolk County Government (.gov)

November 13, 2023

Suffolk County reported the following information related to COVID-19 on November 7, 2023

According to CDC, hospital admission rates and the percentage of COVID-19 deaths among all deaths are now the primary surveillance metrics.

COVID-19 Hospitalizations for the week ending October 28, 2023

Daily Hospitalization Summary for Suffolk County From November 3, 2023

NOTE: HOSPITALS ARE NO LONGER REPORTING DATA TO NYSDOH ON WEEKENDS OR HOLIDAYS.

Fatalities 11/6/23

COVID-19 Case Tracker November 4, 2023

Note: As of May 11, 2023, COVID-19 Community Levels (CCLs) and COVID-19 Community Transmission Levels are no longer calculatable, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* As of 4/4/22, HHS no longer requires entities conducting COVID testing to report negative or indeterminate antigen test results. This may impact the number and interpretation of total test results reported to the state and also impacts calculation of test percent positivity. Because of this, as of 4/5/22, test percent positivity is calculated using PCR tests only. Reporting of total new daily cases (positive results) and cases per 100k will continue to include PCR and antigen tests.

COVID-19 Vaccination Information

Last updated 5/12/23

Vaccination Clinics

As of September 12, 2023, the Suffolk County Department of Health Services is not authorized to offer COVID-19 vaccines to ALL Suffolk County residents.

The department will offer the updated vaccine to only uninsured and underinsured patients through New York State's Vaccines for Children program and Vaccines for Adults program, also known as the Bridge Access Program.

Those with insurance that covers the COVID-19 vaccine are encouraged to receive their vaccines at their local pharmacies, health care providers offices, or local federally qualified health centers.

The department has ordered the updated COVID-19 vaccine and will announce when the vaccine becomes available.

FOR HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS

New York State Links

CDC COVID Data Tracker Rates of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 hospitalizations by vaccination status

For additional information or explanation of data, click on the links provided in throughout this page.

View original post here:

COVID-19 update 11-07-23 - Suffolk County Government (.gov)

Nicki Minaj Looks Back on Her COVID-19 Vaccine Claims Controversy: I Like to Make My Own Assessment – Billboard

November 13, 2023

Trending on Billboard

Nicki Minaj faced quite a bit of backlash in 2021 for sharing her stance against the coronavirus vaccine. Now, more than two years later, shes still not walking back.

In one of the rappers biggest controversies to date, Minaj was accused of spreading misinformation back when the government first started rolling out preventative shots about a year and a half deep into the global pandemic. Revealing at the time that she wouldnt be attending that years Met Gala because she hadnt been vaccinated, which was required of guests, the Barbie World artist also tweeted that a cousins friend in Trinidad had become impotent after the COVID-19 vaccine allegedly caused his testicles to swell.

Her tweets earned concerned responses from Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Trinidad & Tobago Health Minister and even the Philadelphia Health Department, each of them debunking her claim and emphasizing that there was no scientific basis to the side effects supposedly made by her cousins friend. She became the butt of late-night jokes and even went toe to toe with both the White House and Piers Morgan over the controversy. But in a new interview, Minaj had no regrets to share.

Im one of those people who doesnt go with a crowd, she told Vogue in her December cover story published Thursday (Nov. 9). I like to make my own assessment of everything without help from everyone.

Every time I talk about politics, people get mad, Minaj added. Im sorry, but I am not going to be told who I should get on social media and campaign for. Theres a lot we dont know thats going on in the government, and I dont think it changes whether you lean to the left or right.

The interview comes one month ahead of Minajs upcoming album, Pink Friday 2, which was originally scheduled to arrive Oct. 20 before being pushed back to Nov. 17. In late October, the Queen of Rap announced that the project would be postponed once more to Dec. 8, her 41st birthday.

See Nicki Minajs Vogue cover and photos below:

See more

Originally posted here:

Nicki Minaj Looks Back on Her COVID-19 Vaccine Claims Controversy: I Like to Make My Own Assessment - Billboard

Have you gotten the new COVID-19 vaccine yet? – Honolulu Star-Advertiser

November 13, 2023

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.

Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.

View post:

Have you gotten the new COVID-19 vaccine yet? - Honolulu Star-Advertiser

B.C. counts over 1M flu vaccines, almost 850K COVID-19 vaccines administered in past 6 weeks – CBC.ca

November 13, 2023

Edmonton

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share by Email

Posted: March 21, 2020

With the COVID-19 pandemic forcing businesses to shut down and workers to self-isolate, the provincial and federal governments are implementing measures that will provide Albertans with some financial relief. Here's what has been announced so far.

Those who have worked at least 600 hours in the last 52 weeks can qualify for Employment Insurance (EI).

EI benefits are available to those who have lost their job through no fault of their own and are available to work.

Those who qualify can also apply for the EI sickness benefit, which can giveup to 15 weeks of payment, worth 55 per cent of earnings to a maximum of $573 per week.

The federal government also removed the one-week waiting period for sickness benefits for those who have been told to self-isolate or quarantine.

If you qualify for EI and are also caring for someone who is critically ill, you can also apply for EI caregiver benefits. That adds between15 and35 weeks of payments, worth up to 55 per cent of the individual's usual pay or $573 per week, whichever is less. Those who qualifycan apply on the EI website.

In addition, the province is also offering emergency isolation support.That will give workers who had to self-isolate or care for a person who needed to self-isolate and don't have another source of payment,a one-time payment of $573 for two weeks while they're waiting for federal benefits. Albertans can apply online starting next week.

The federal government is offering the emergency care benefit for people who can't work because of self-isolation or for people caring for someone else who is ill. This benefit gives individuals up to 15 weeks of payment, worth up to $450 per week.

Another benefit offered by Canada is the emergency support benefit, offered to people who have lost their ability to work because of public health orders and don't qualify for EI. That includes self-employed individuals and contractors. The details of how much it is and how to get it is coming in the next few weeks.

Application for both benefits are done online through the CRA.

Canada has announced the new Business Credit Availability program, which will provide lending support to small, medium and large businesses experiencing cash-flow challenges.

The details of how much money businesses qualify for and how to get support are still being developed by the government.

"Businesses looking to take advantage of the recently announced $10B Business Credit Availability program should first see their own financial institution for support and assessment, and then, if the support required extends beyond what the financial institution can provide, the business will be referred to BDC or[Export Development Canada]," saidShawn Salewski, spokesperson for the Business Development Bank of Canada.

Ottawa also created,through the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions, $300B in additional lending capacity for financial institutions to provide more credit to their clients,Salewski said.

Charles St-Arnaud, chief economist for Alberta Central,thecentral banking facility for Alberta's credit unions,said employers can also apply for a federal wage subsidy, which for the next 90 dayswill grant employers up to a maximum of $1,375 per employee and $25,000 per employer.

Businesses can also defer to pay their income tax for six months, untilAug. 31, without interestand penalties for tax amounts owing from now to September.

Canada's six big banks have agreed to allow people to defer mortgage payments for up to six months. Those are the Bank of Montreal, CIBC, National Bank of Canada, RBC Royal Bank, Scotiabank and TD Bank. Credit unions are also coming up with a similar program.

"It's really just lengthening your amortization schedule," said Lorne Rackel, general manager and broker of record withJayman Financial.

"By no means are those payments of interests being waived. They're just being tacked onto the back of the back of the mortgage," he said.

Rackel saidit's essentially the principal amount and interest that's being deferred.

He said most banks have now set up teams and call centres to deal with the requests, so people who want a deferral should look at the call options provided by their bank.

Alberta has announced a six month, interest-free moratorium on student loan payments. Payments can be paused for six months starting on March 30 and students don't have to apply for the repayment pause. The same applies for federal student loan debt. Borrowers can continue making payments during this period if they wish.

The province said residential, farm and small commercial customers can defer their utility bill payments for the next 90 days and no one will be cut off from these services during the crisis. This includes electricity and natural gas.

Rackel said it's possible for people to get deferral on other loans and credit card debts, so people should reach out directly to their bank and lenders for more information.

Jennifer Robson, associate professor in political management at Carleton University, said people who qualify for the GST credit and the Canada Child Benefit will also get a big top upsoon.

Robson urges people to file their taxes to get their returns, which could include those benefits.

"Make sure you're signing for those benefits you're entitled to," she said.

See the rest here:

B.C. counts over 1M flu vaccines, almost 850K COVID-19 vaccines administered in past 6 weeks - CBC.ca

Free Flu & COVID-19 Vaccine Pop-Up | City of Berkeley – The City of Berkeley

November 6, 2023

Two vaccines, one visit. Protect yourself and loved ones by getting a free flu and COVID-19 shot. Join uson Monday, November 6, at Dorothy Day House.

The first and best way to protect against the flu and COVID-19 is to get vaccinated.Everyone 6 months and older is eligible for a flu shot, and everyone 5 years and older are eligible for the updated COVID-19 shot. Our vaccination pop-up is a quick and easy way to avoid getting sick.No appointment needed, and no ID or health insurance required. Some restrictions apply for COVID-19 vaccine eligibility.

Getting vaccinated helps protect children and people with compromised immune systems. Children younger than 5 years old have a greater chance of having problems with the flu, especially those with a long-term condition such as asthma and diabetes. People who have a chronic disease or weakened immune systems are more likely to have severe problems if they get the flu or COVID-19.

Where: 1931 Center Street, Berkeley, CA 94704

When: 8:30 am-9:45 am

Please feel free to call (510) 981-5350, or email the Public Health mailbox at phmailbox@berkeleyca.gov, with any questions.

Read the original here:

Free Flu & COVID-19 Vaccine Pop-Up | City of Berkeley - The City of Berkeley

Good practice statement on the use of variant-containing COVID-19 … – ReliefWeb

November 6, 2023

This Good Practice Statement on the use of variant-containing COVID-19 vaccines was updated on the basis of advice by the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on Immunization at its meeting on 28 September 2023.

In May 2023, the Technical Advisory Group on COVID-19 Vaccine Composition (TAG-CO-VAC) recommended moving away from including the ancestral strain in future COVID-19 vaccine formulations. The reasons for adopting a monovalent variant-containing approach to target current and emerging variants can be found here.

The updated recommendations made by TAG-CO-VAC and this Good Practice Statement synthesize current evidence on variant-containing COVID-19 vaccines, notably those containing XBB. This document contains some off-label recommendationsa .

In this document, the terms primary series and initial doses are used interchangeably, and so are the terms additional doses and booster doses.

Background and methods

Globally, population-level immunity against SARS-CoV-2 has increased substantially due to widespread COVID-19 vaccine-derived immunity, SARS-CoV-2 infection-derived immunity, or a combination of both (hybrid immunity). Meanwhile, significant reductions in severe disease and death related to SARS-CoV-2 have been observed across all age groups. As such, most countries have lifted many or all of their public health measures.

In the fourth year of the pandemic, new SARS-CoV-2 subvariants continue to circulate globally, leaving vulnerable populations at continued risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 disease and death. The spike protein of SARSCoV-2 continues to diverge from the ancestral strain.

After Omicron emerged in November 2021, earlier variants (Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta) disappeared from humans. By May 2023, global prevalence was dominated by Omicron subvariants including XBB.1.5, XBB.1.16 and XBB.1.9. More recently, additional Omicron subvariants have emerged, such as EG.5 and BA.2.86.

While Omicron and its subvariants have led to less severe disease than the ancestral strain, there have been surges in hospitalization and death in vulnerable populations due to elevated community transmission and periodic waves of infections.

WHO conducted a rapid review of current evidence on XBB variants and monovalent XBB vaccines retrieved from scientific publications, preprints, and data provided by manufacturers (1-3). The following topics were reviewed:

immune evasion in humans;

variant-adapted vaccines: humoral and cell-mediated immune responses following vaccination and/or infection in humans and animals;

vaccine effectiveness; and

vaccine safety.

Here is the original post:

Good practice statement on the use of variant-containing COVID-19 ... - ReliefWeb

Association Between Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Effects and … – Cureus

November 6, 2023

Specialty

Please choose I'm not a medical professional. Allergy and Immunology Anatomy Anesthesiology Cardiac/Thoracic/Vascular Surgery Cardiology Critical Care Dentistry Dermatology Diabetes and Endocrinology Emergency Medicine Epidemiology and Public Health Family Medicine Forensic Medicine Gastroenterology General Practice Genetics Geriatrics Health Policy Hematology HIV/AIDS Hospital-based Medicine I'm not a medical professional. Infectious Disease Integrative/Complementary Medicine Internal Medicine Internal Medicine-Pediatrics Medical Education and Simulation Medical Physics Medical Student Nephrology Neurological Surgery Neurology Nuclear Medicine Nutrition Obstetrics and Gynecology Occupational Health Oncology Ophthalmology Optometry Oral Medicine Orthopaedics Osteopathic Medicine Otolaryngology Pain Management Palliative Care Pathology Pediatrics Pediatric Surgery Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Plastic Surgery Podiatry Preventive Medicine Psychiatry Psychology Pulmonology Radiation Oncology Radiology Rheumatology Substance Use and Addiction Surgery Therapeutics Trauma Urology Miscellaneous

Read the rest here:

Association Between Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Effects and ... - Cureus

Page 60«..1020..59606162..7080..»