Category: Covid-19

Page 460«..1020..459460461462..470480..»

14 new COVID-19 cases & one nonresident death reported for Juneau City and Borough of Juneau – City and Borough of Juneau

September 15, 2021

The Alaska Department of Health and Social Services (DHSS) reports 14 new individuals in the Juneau community 13 residents and one nonresident identified with COVID-19 for September 14. DHSS also reports one nonresident death for Juneau a female in her 60s. The individual was initially diagnosed with COVID-19 in Juneau and later sought medical care outside Juneau where she eventually died. CBJ extends condolences to family members and friends of this individual.

The total number of deaths associated with Juneau is currently nine eight residents (two died out of state) and one nonresident. There arecurrentlyfour people with COVID-19 hospitalized at Bartlett Regional Hospital.

For September 13 14, The Juneau School District reports seven individuals whove tested positive for COVID-19 and were infectious while in school:

COVID-19 cases related to schools are posted on thedistrict website(click on the green COVID-19 Cases block). Find more district-related COVID-19 information atjuneauschools.org.

Juneau Public Health reports these generalized case trends for the past week:

Statewide, the Alaska Department of Health and Social Services reports691 new peopleidentified with COVID-19 676 are residents and 15 are nonresidents. The state also reports seven deaths six residents and one nonresident bringing the total number of resident deaths to 451 and nonresident deaths to 15. Alaska has had 93,039 cumulative resident cases of COVID-19 and a total of 4,287 nonresidents.

Juneau vaccine update:

For more information, read CBJs Emergency Operations Center Reportshere.

Read this article:

14 new COVID-19 cases & one nonresident death reported for Juneau City and Borough of Juneau - City and Borough of Juneau

DHEC Updates Its Statewide School COVID-19 Reporting to Include Quarantined and Isolated Students and School Employees – SCDHEC

September 15, 2021

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:Sept. 15, 2021

COLUMBIA, S.C. Today, the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC) is updating its online reporting of COVID-19 Associated with Students & Staff to help parents, caregivers and school officials have additional data about COVID-19s impact on schools.

DHEC has been working with the S.C. Department of Education to implement a new weekly reporting tool for schools and districts that captures how many students and staff were in quarantine and isolation the previous week due to COVID-19. Beginning today, DHECs school cases dashboard will be archived and replaced with a new weekly report for K-12 public, private, and charter schools that provides COVID-19 numbers as reported directly from our states schools. This updated reporting includes the number of students and school staff who are isolated meaning they are a positive COVID-19 case and the number who are quarantined meaning they are close contacts. The cumulative number of individuals quarantined and isolated since the start of the 2021-2022 school year will also be included.We appreciate the ongoing support and dedication of our school officials, teachers and school employees around the state during these challenging, stressful and emotional times, said Dr. Brannon Traxler, DHEC Public Health Director. We know that school officials consider many factors when they make decisions about classroom instruction, and we hope that including quarantine and isolation numbers in our statewide school reporting will provide an additional data set for informing school officials, as well as students, parents and caregivers, about the current status of COVID-19s effect on our schools.

While DHECs previous school cases dashboard was updated Tuesdays and Fridays, the webpage will now be updated once a week, on Wednesdays, with this expanded school reporting. DHEC sends this new quarantine and isolation survey to schools at 7 a.m. on Fridays, and schools need to report that information back to DHEC by noon on Tuesdays in order for it to be represented on the agencys webpage on Wednesdays. An NR in the reporting means a school did not report information to the agency on time.

As we work with all charter, public and private schools in the state to implement this new weekly reporting tool, the isolation and quarantine information may be incomplete initially, since the information is coming directly from our states schools, said Dr. Traxler. If your schools data isnt included in our DHEC reporting, please reach out and encourage your school to participate in this important public health effort.

While school officials, not DHEC, determine whether a school should operate in-person or virtually, DHEC's regional epidemiology teams provide the most current guidance and other information as requested so school officials can make the most informed decisions possible, in the best interest of the health and wellbeing of their students and staff.

DHEC public health officials continue to strongly urge all eligible South Carolinians to get vaccinated as soon as possible to not only protect themselves, but to protect children under the age of 12 who cant get vaccinated and are vulnerable to COVID-19 and its variants. Masks should also be worn by students, teachers, visitors, and everyone whos in a school setting or on a bus.

DHECs 2021-2022 interim school guidance is available for everyone here.

###

See the rest here:

DHEC Updates Its Statewide School COVID-19 Reporting to Include Quarantined and Isolated Students and School Employees - SCDHEC

New Mexico health, education officials to address states COVID-19 trends Wednesday – KRQE News 13

September 15, 2021

Watch news conference livestream here beginning at 2 p.m.

by: Chris McKee

A new study from the CDC looking at more than half a million people has come to the conclusion that COVID vaccines remain effective. (Joel CarrettAAP Image viaAP)

NEW MEXICO(KRQE) One week after state health officials noted an apparent deceleration in the number of new COVID-19 cases in New Mexico, officials are expected to update the latest case trends during a news conference Tuesday afternoon. KRQE News 13 will live stream the briefing on this page, with coverage beginning around 2 p.m.

The latest weekly report on New Mexicos COVID-19 trends comes amid a summer where the state has seen a surge of new cases across July and August. Just last month, health officials expressed concern about the summer 2021 spike looking similar to the states worst COVID-19 spike in late 2020.

During an August 11 news conference, New Mexico Department of Healths Epidemiologist Christine Ross said the increase in cases at the time looked similar to what (the state) saw prior to (New Mexicos) worst surge to date in the winter. At the time, case counts were 10 times higher than they were the first week of July, according to state data.

However, since then, the state has seen a deceleration in the number of new COVID-19 cases. According to data posted on the states COVID-19 dashboard, as of September 10, the 7-day average of new COVID-19 cases in New Mexico had dropped to 382 new cases a day. On August 25, the states 7-day average appeared to spike at 862 new cases a day.

On Tuesday, Sept. 14, New Mexico announced 749 new COVID-19 cases, bringing the states total to 242,399 cases. Twelve additional deaths were announced.

New Mexicos Acting Department of Health Secretary and Department of Human Services Dr. David Scrase is expected to participate in Wednesdays news conference, alongside the states Public Education Secretary-designate Dr. Kurt Steinhaus. NMDOH Deputy Secretary Dr. Laura Parajon is also expected to join the conversation.

Read the original here:

New Mexico health, education officials to address states COVID-19 trends Wednesday - KRQE News 13

Researchers Say Some People Have Developed Superhuman Immunity Against COVID-19 – CBS Dallas / Fort Worth

September 15, 2021

DALLAS (CBSDFW.COM) Studies show both hybrid immunity and superhuman immunity are ways in which our bodies may have extra fighting power against COVID-19.

Experts say theyve heard the terms used interchangeably, but theyre a little bit different.

Hybrid immunity, is when someone has had COVID-19 and the vaccine.

It provides people with antibodies from both.

Superhuman immunity starts off the same way, but that some people with particular genetics can develop even more immunity.

There are some of us that have this super ability to be able to recover from infections, COVID being one of them, a little better than the general population, said Archana Narayan, and Immunologist with North Texas Allergy & Asthma Associates.

Experts say its a rare phenomenon.

Its a descriptive term for an individual to generate very high amounts of neutralizing antibodies, Dr. Mohanakrishnan Sathyamoorthy, Chair of Internal Medicine, TCU and UNTHSC.

Studies show that some folks may have hit the genetic jackpot, meaning their bodies can develop very high levels antibodies that neutralize the virus.

They are also capable of fighting off present and future variants of COVID-19.

They say theres no specific clinical test you can take to determine if someone has super human immunity, other than a regular antibody test to assess ones general immunity, if recommended by a doctor.

Other than that, they say the best bet is to get the COVID-19 vaccine.

If youve been infected then you can take comfort in knowing on top of that infection, you can boost your immune response with a vaccine. You can create a level of immune response thats remarkable, Dr. Mohanakrishnan said.

Here is the original post:

Researchers Say Some People Have Developed Superhuman Immunity Against COVID-19 - CBS Dallas / Fort Worth

COVID-19 vaccines: Here’s how to spot misinformation on social media and fight it – Detroit Free Press

September 15, 2021

COVID misinformation: FDA warns about ivermectin as COVID treatment

It's just one of the many online rumors floating around about the coronavirus, treatments and the vaccine.

Staff video, USA TODAY

Believe it or not, you mayhave more power in getting others vaccinated against COVID-19 than scientists.

In recent years, social media research and large-scale social network experiments haveshown that family and friends could be more effective than public health officials in terms of directing useful information to those around us, largely because we tend to trust knowledgable people who are close to us and can tailor our messaging to better connect with loved ones.

From The Scientific American:

Indeed, a sibling or a friend online or next door is in some ways better able to underscore the importance of behaviors such as masking and physical distancing than public health agencies or experts such as (Dr. Anthony) Fauci. Its not only that we trust information from knowledgeable people who are close to us but that those in our lives can find opportune moments to explain why preventive behaviors are important to them and why they trust the science that says those actions reduce the spread of the virus. A neighbor or a friend can respond with messages tailored to a persons interests and concerns. In addition to correcting misconceptions in real time, a confidant can create an environment inhospitable to misinformation in the first place. Finally, and critically, deception and debunking usually occur in different venues: those who are exposed to misconceptions rarely encounter the fact-checks.

In other words, you and I have a part to play in championing the truth. And it's a good thing we have that power, because the internet today is a Wild West, where false information thrives as well as true information, and can lead to dire real-life consequences.

That especially has been true when it comes to COVID-19 vaccines. In recent months, you likely have been bombarded with inaccurate or misleading information regarding the efficacy and safety of vaccines, created by bad actors on the internet and later shared by friends, family, celebrities, influencers and politicians all over Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and other social platforms. This misinformation sometimes purposefully manufactured to influence you, which is called disinformation has played a role in tens of millions of Americans electing not to receive a vaccine.

So you might be wondering: How do I deal with this? How do I spot misinformation (and disinformation) on social media, and how can I fight it? Glad you asked.Here are some strategies to employ as you peruse social media and the internet at large going forward.

More:Your COVID-19 vaccine questions, answered

If there is one rule you should follow when it comes to using the internet and social media, it's this: Don't believe everything you read.

"Just dont buy into it immediately," said Keenan Chen, a research reporter for First Draft, a nonprofit coalition founded in 2015 to protect communities from misinformation campaigns.

You must treat everything with a healthy level of skepticism. We're not saying assume everything's false until proven otherwise; just consider the possibility that it could be.

This means double-checking the claims on that meme your uncle shared on Facebook (by searching the claims on Google to see where they might becoming from),or doing a reverse image searchon that unbelievable photo your friend retweeted on Twitter (by going to google.com/imghp and "searching" the image to find its original source). Closely look at links, and verify websites you've never heard of so you ensure it's coming from a reliable source. Some of these websites don't even have "About Us" pages, which is a major red flag.

Even if the story is from a reputable news source, read beyond the headline because, unfortunately, some headlines tend to inadvertently amplify false claims.

And lastly, "understand the motive," Chen said. Remember that the most popular and engaging posts on social media tend to stir up some form of emotion inside you, whether it's happiness, sadness, anger, nostalgia, etc.So take a beat before making a knee-jerk reaction when you see something emotionalonline.

"Thosewebsites you see with volatile headlines, thats usually where the unreliable information comes from," Chen said.

If you see something on social media you think mightbe false or misleading, consider the source.

If it's a person, try Googling their name and seeing what you find. If it's a website, see what else they're reporting and what their "About Us" page looks like. Google and Wikipedia are your friends; use them to search for names of people and organizations who are making the claims.

Keep in mind that a common strategy in disinformation campaigns is offering a "kernelof truth" in posting false or misleading information. So while something in the claim might technically be true, that truth could be twisted into something false.

"The most effective misinformation is partially true, partially false," Chen said.

Vaccinating Michigan: Tracking the progress of the state's COVID-19 vaccine rollout

So you've seen a claim on social media and you did your research to find out it's inaccurate (or misleading). What should you do next?

Chen offers one thing youshouldn'tdo: Share it.

"It may sound unrealistic, but dont easily share posts on social media," he said. "By sharing it, you are making it more viral and reaching out to more people (with the false information)."

Likewise, hitting 'like' and commenting on a post also could amplify it to your friends and family, and inadvertently signal that you endorse the post.

Some well-intentioned social media users will share a false claim or a bad headline so they can "dunk" on it, especially on Twitter, where the quote-tweet function makes it quite easy to mock, disaparage or attack others. But in the grand scheme of things, that tends to backfire because the false claim or bad headline is amplified by users sharing it, especially if they don't respond with an alternative or an explanation.

So what can you do instead?

When a loved one of yours is buying into a false narrative online, or is sharing misleading or false information in some fashion, approaching them in a non-confrontational way about why it's wrong is ideal, Chen said.

"Be patient, be a good friend (or family member), andexplain why thats not true," Chen said. "You could say,'I can show you something that scientists say that ...' or some other way. Justdont be confrontational."

Back up your claims by offering links and resources from reputableplaces. Practice empathy and listen to their concerns. Acknowledge that you don't have the answer to every question "sometimes, fact-checkers will say something is true or false but cannot explain why," Chen said.It's not easy, and it may not always work, but it's better than letting a potentially dangerous belief go unchecked.

Remember, you may have more power in getting the people around you vaccinated than scientists.So use social media in a way that properly debunks false information with effective fact-checking.

Want to learn more about spotting and combating misinformation (and disinformation)? Here are some resources for you to bookmark:

News Lit Quiz: Should you share it?(News Literacy Project)

How to Debunk Misinformation about COVID, Vaccines and Masks(Scientific American)

VAERS: How to stop misinformation related to the US vaccine database(First Draft)

Young African Americans Communication with Family Members About COVID-19: Impact on Vaccination Intention and Implications for Health Communication Interventions(Diane B. Francis, Nia Mason & Aurora Occa)

Covid-19 vaccines: A leap of faith and the power of trust among Black and Hispanic communities(First Draft)

Brian Manzullo is the social, search and audience editor of the Detroit Free Press. Contact him: bmanzullo@freepress.com and on Twitter, @BrianManzullo.

View post:

COVID-19 vaccines: Here's how to spot misinformation on social media and fight it - Detroit Free Press

How the U.S. Nailed the Economic Response to Covid-19 – The Wall Street Journal

September 15, 2021

Countless things have gone wrong since Covid-19 arrived on American shores, yet this week we got proof of something that really went right: the economic policy response.

The pandemic-induced shutdown was initially the worst hit to the U.S. economy since the Great Depression. Employment and output both fell more last year than in 2008 during the financial crisis.

See the original post:

How the U.S. Nailed the Economic Response to Covid-19 - The Wall Street Journal

Charlie Baker says a lot of people got the COVID-19 outbreak in Provincetown all wrong – Boston.com

September 15, 2021

CoronavirusFoot traffic along Commercial street in Provincetown in July. Barry Chin / The Boston Globe

Gov. Charlie Baker says one of the biggest challenges government leaders like himself have faced during the COVID-19 pandemic is accurately conveying and contextualizing information about the evolving virus.

And during a speech Tuesday, the Massachusetts governor acknowledged that there have been times when government leaders, healthcare leaders, all of us have not done a good job of describing whats actually been happening.

His primary example: the now-infamous COVID-19 outbreak in Provincetown.

The outbreak, which ballooned to over 1,000 cases among mostly vaccinated individuals, drove headlines suggesting a failure of the vaccines, Baker said, when in fact it was just the opposite.

This is in fact a demonstration of success on the part of vaccines, but that really wasnt the media story, Baker said during a virtual address Tuesday morning to the New England Council.

Baker said that were estimated to be about 10,000 people in the Cape Cod town during the July weekend that outbreak began, a collision between the highly transmissible delta variant and one of the most vaccinated communities in the state.

A popular getaway destination in the LGBT community, Provincetown hosts a series of party weekends during the month of July. However, as Baker noted, rain forced much of the activity indoors during the Fourth of July weekend.

Friday, Saturday, Sunday, Monday it rained all four days, so all the outdoor activity that was expected to take place got moved inside, Baker said. Crowded packed bars, restaurants, nightclubs, hotel lobbies, the works. And lots of house parties that people thought were going to be outside that were inside.

According to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention study that led the agency to change its face covering guidelines, roughly three quarters of the cases associated with the outbreak were among vaccinated individuals in a town where over 90 percent of the people were estimated to have gotten the vaccine.

Ultimately, the cluster was deemed to be north of 1000 cases, Baker said Tuesday. And this led to some real headlines across the country and in this region that said, you know, OMG, you know, all these people went to this big weekend in Provincetown and they were all vaccinated and there were a lot of cases that came out of it. And frankly, a lot of people interpreted that as the vaccines dont work.

But the story is actually a lot different than that, he added.

While the outbreak demonstrated that even fully vaccinated individuals could transmit the delta variant, it also showed how effective the vaccines were at preventing spread and, especially, serious illness due to COVID-19.

Baker noted that some infectious disease experts have estimated that the outbreak would have been roughly five times larger if no one was vaccinated. Additionally, there were only seven hospitalizations connected to the outbreak, as well as one death among an elderly man who was immunocompromised.

Everybody whos studied this issue says there would have been, you know, a number you cant even calculate more with respect to how many hospitalizations there would have been if all those folks hadnt been vaccinated, Baker said. And one gentleman unfortunately passed away. He was in his 70s and he was in active chemotherapy treatment.

Most of the news coverage has since come to reflect that reality, but Baker says the outbreak complicated messaging efforts promoting the vaccines efficacy.

That in many ways has been one of the biggest challenges we in government have faced throughout the course of this pandemic, which is trying to get not only the message right but also the narrative arc of the message over the long term right about whats correct, he said.

Baker noted that the data about the vaccines effectiveness is pretty compelling. A recent Wall Street Journal analysis found that every single state with ahigher-than-average vaccination rate also had lower-than-average hospitalization rates, even amid this summers delta-fueled surge.

If you look at the states that have the highest vaccination rates obviously, Massachusetts, New England, and the Northeast would be among the national leaders there we have lower case counts per capita, but more importantly we also have lower hospitalization rates and lower death rates than the vast majority of other states around the country, Baker said.

And if you look at the states that have the lowest vaccination rates, theyre the ones that are struggling with the highest case counts, the highest hospitalization rates, and the highest death rates, he added.

Baker added that unvaccinated individuals who are hospitalized also tend to be a lot sicker than the folks who have been vaccinated.

I wish there was a really simple, easy way to help everybody understand this, he said.

Over the last 18 months, Baker said there were a lot of night where I didnt get a lot of sleep where he would go downstairs and watch British parliament debates on TV a really crazy thing to do and realized his frustrations about communication were also shared across the Atlantic.

When you toss in the high anxiety that comes with the rest of this, it becomes a profoundly complex conversation, Baker said, adding that overcoming vaccine hesitancy in addition to government mistrust turns us into a very complicated and difficult messaging exercise.

That said, Baker added that he was incredibly grateful that so many people have gotten vaccinated in Massachusetts, which has at least partially vaccinated over 88 percent of all adults, the second highest rate in the country.

That is the path out of this and were going to have to continue to concentrate on it, he said.

Stay up to date on all the latest news from Boston.com

Originally posted here:

Charlie Baker says a lot of people got the COVID-19 outbreak in Provincetown all wrong - Boston.com

COVID-19 in South Dakota: 568 total new cases; Death toll increases to 2,093; Active cases at 7,364 – KELOLAND.com

September 15, 2021

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (KELO) More than 550 new COVID-19 cases were announced in Wednesdays update from theSouth Dakota Department of Health.

With 568 new total COVID-19 cases reported Wednesday, the states total case count is now at 138,860 up from Tuesday (138,292).

Active cases are now at 7,364, up from Tuesday (7,263).

The death toll from COVID-19 is now at 2,093, up one from Tuesday (2,092). The new death was a man from Pennington County in the 30 -39 year old age group.

Current hospitalizations are at 204, down from Tuesday (215). Total hospitalizations are now at 7,100, up from Tuesday (7,090).

Total recovered cases are now at 129,403, up from Tuesday (128,937). The latest seven-day PCR test positivity rate for the state is 14.2% for September 7 through September 13.

The DOH currently reports total tests each day. There have been 1,433,766 total tests reported as of Wednesday, up 6,707 from 1,427,059 total tests reported on Tuesday.

Of South Dakotas 66 counties, 53 are listed as having high community spread. High community spread is 100 cases or greater per 100,000 or a 10% or greater PCR test positivity rate. Three counties (Jerauld, Potter and Sully) are listed as low community spread.

Theres been 289 confirmed cases of the Delta variant (B.1.617.2, AY.1-AY.3) detected in South Dakota through sentinel monitoring.

There have been 172 cases of the B.1.1.7 (Alpha variant), 3 cases of P.1. (Gamma variant) and 1 cases of the B.1.351 (Beta variant). An unknown variant case has also been found.

As of Wednesday, 63.17% of the population 12-year-olds and above has received at least one dose while 57.46% have completed the vaccination series.

There have been 427,028 doses of the Pfizer vaccine administered, 313,856 of the Moderna vaccine and 27,346 doses of the Janssen vaccine.

There have been 151,117 persons who have completed two doses of Moderna and 202,975 who have received two doses of Pfizer.

The number of people who completed the Pfizer vaccine went up by 621 patients; 447 people completed the Moderna vaccine series.

Follow this link:

COVID-19 in South Dakota: 568 total new cases; Death toll increases to 2,093; Active cases at 7,364 - KELOLAND.com

Majority in U.S. Says Public Health Benefits of COVID-19 Restrictions Worth the Costs, Even as Large Shares Also See Downsides – Pew Research Center

September 15, 2021

Moviegoers have their COVID-19 vaccination status checked before entering an LGBTQ film festival screening on Aug. 21, 2021, in Los Angeles. (Amanda Edwards/Getty Images)

Pew Research Center conducted this study to understand how Americans are continuing to respond to the coronavirus outbreak. For this analysis, we surveyed 10,348 U.S. adults from Aug. 23 to 29, 2021.

Everyone who took part in the survey is a member of the Centers American Trends Panel (ATP), an online survey panel that is recruited through national, random sampling of residential addresses. This way, nearly all U.S. adults have a chance of selection. The survey is weighted to be representative of the U.S. adult population by gender, race, ethnicity, partisan affiliation, education and other categories. Read more about the ATPs methodology.

See here to read more about the questions used for this report, along with responses and its methodology.

More than a year and a half into the coronavirus outbreak, large shares of Americans continue to see the coronavirus as a major threat to public health and the U.S. economy. And despite widespread vaccination efforts, 54% of U.S. adults say the worst of the outbreak is still to come.

The toll of restrictions on public activities in order to slow the spread of the coronavirus is deeply felt across groups: Overwhelming majorities say restrictions have done a lot or some to hurt businesses and economic activity and keep people from living their lives the way they want. Smaller majorities say these restrictions have helped at least some to prevent hospitalizations and deaths from the coronavirus and to slow the spread of the virus. Still, when asked to issue an overall judgment, Americans on balance view the public health benefits of these restrictions as having been worth the costs (62% to 37%).

A new national survey by Pew Research Center, conducted from Aug. 23 to 29 among 10,348 U.S. adults, prior to President Joe Bidens announcement of COVID-19 vaccine mandates for employers, finds that 73% of those ages 18 and older say theyve received at least one dose of a vaccine for COVID-19, with the vast majority of this group saying they have received all the shots they need to be fully vaccinated. About a quarter of adults (26%) say they have not received a vaccine.

Vaccination rates vary significantly across demographic groups, with smaller majorities of younger adults, those with lower family incomes and those living in rural areas saying theyve received a COVID-19 vaccine. No more than six-in-ten of those without health insurance and White evangelical Protestants say theyve been vaccinated (57% each). Notably, Black adults are now about as likely as White adults to say theyve received a vaccine. Earlier in the outbreak, Black adults were less likely than White adults to say they planned to get a COVID-19 vaccine.

Partisan affiliation remains one of the widest differences in vaccination status: 86% of Democrats and independents who lean toward the Democratic Party have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, compared with 60% of Republicans and Republican leaners.

Americans express a range of sometimes cross-pressured sentiments toward vaccines. Overall, 73% say the statement vaccines are the best way to protect Americans from COVID-19 describes their views very or somewhat well; 60% say their views are described at least somewhat well by the statement people who choose not to get a COVID-19 vaccine are hurting the country.

At the same time, 51% of the public says that the phrase theres too much pressure on Americans to get a COVID-19 vaccine describes their own views very or somewhat well. And 61% say the same about the statement we dont really know yet if there are serious health risks from COVID-19 vaccines.

Vaccinated adults and those who have not received a vaccine differ widely in their views of vaccines as well as other elements of the broader coronavirus outbreak. For instance, 77% of vaccinated adults say the statement people who choose not to get a COVID-19 vaccine are hurting the country describes them at least somewhat well. By contrast, 88% of those who have not received a vaccine say that theres too much pressure on Americans to get a COVID-19 vaccine describes their own views very or somewhat well.

However, vaccinated adults are not without anxieties and concerns surrounding vaccines: 54% of this group says the statement we dont really know yet if there are serious health risks from COVID-19 vaccines describes them very or somewhat well, and 50% say the same about the statement its hard to make sense of all the information about COVID-19 vaccines.

With the delta variant having changed the trajectory of the outbreak in the United States and around the world, large majorities continue to see a number of steps as necessary to address the coronavirus, including requiring masks for travelers on airplanes and public transportation (80%), restricting international travel (79%) and asking people to avoid gathering in large groups (73%).

The public is closely divided over limiting restaurants to carry-out and closing K-12 schools for in-person learning: About as many adults say these steps are unnecessary as say they are necessary.

Vaccination requirements for in-person activities have gone into effect in a number of U.S. cities, including New Orleans, New York City and San Francisco. A 61% majority of Americans favor requiring adults to show proof of vaccination before being allowed to travel by airplane. More than half also say proof of vaccination should be required to attend public colleges and universities (57%) and to go to sporting events and concerts (56%).

However, the public is less convinced that vaccine requirements are needed in other settings. Equal shares of Americans favor and oppose requiring proof of vaccination to eat inside of a restaurant (50% vs. 50%), and 54% say they oppose a vaccination requirement to shop inside stores and businesses.

The intertwined dynamics of partisan affiliation and vaccination status are visible in views of policies to limit the spread of the coronavirus and vaccine requirements. Democrats offer broad support for most measures, while Republicans back select steps like limiting international travel and requiring masks on public transportation while opposing others and offering very little support for vaccine mandates. Similarly, vaccinated adults are far more supportive of policy steps aimed at limiting the spread of the coronavirus and vaccine requirements than are those who have not received a COVID-19 vaccine.

Over the course of the pandemic, public health officials have changed their recommendations about how to slow the spread of the coronavirus in the U.S.

A majority of Americans (61%) say changes to public health recommendations since the start of the outbreak have made sense because scientific knowledge is always being updated. About half (51%) say these changes have reassured them that public health officials are staying on top of new information.

However, changes to public health guidance have also sparked confusion and skepticism among significant shares of the public: 55% say changes made them wonder if public health officials were holding back important information, 53% say it made them feel confused and 51% say it made them less confident in officials recommendations.

Taken together, 63% of U.S. adults say theyve felt at least one of two negative reactions regarding public health officials because of changing guidance: wondering if they were holding back important information or feeling less confident in their recommendations.

Mask wearing among the most visible examples of shifting public health guidance, as well as a policy flashpoint at the state and local level has become less frequent since earlier this year. Overall, 53% of U.S. adults say theyve been wearing a mask or face covering all or most of the time when in stores and businesses over the last month, down 35 percentage points from 88% who said this in February (when mask requirements around the country were more widespread).

The practice of mask wearing is now far more common among Democrats and those who have been vaccinated against COVID-19. Democrats are now more than twice as likely as Republicans to say theyve been wearing a mask in stores and businesses all or most of the time in recent weeks (71% vs. 30%). In February, large shares of both Democrats and Republicans had reported frequent mask wearing (93% and 83%, respectively).

People who have received a COVID-19 vaccine (59%) are more likely than those who have not (37%) to say theyve been wearing a mask all or most of the time when inside stores or businesses. Frequent mask wearing is especially high among those who say they are very concerned about getting a serious case of the disease (80%).

Vaccination rates differ across key demographic groups and traits, including age, family income, partisanship, health insurance status, community type and religious affiliation.

Comparable majorities of Black (70%) and White (72%) adults have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. Among Hispanic adults, 76% say they have received a vaccine, as do an overwhelming majority of English-speaking Asian adults (94%).

At earlier stages of the outbreak, Black adults had expressed significantly lower levels of intent to get a COVID-19 vaccine than White adults.

The vaccination rate among White evangelical Protestants continues to lag behind those of other major religious groups: 57% of White evangelicals say they have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, compared with 73% of White Protestants who are not evangelicals, 75% of religiously unaffiliated adults and 82% of Catholics. For more details on vaccination status by religion, see the Appendix.

Older adults remain more likely than younger adults to have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. Age differences in vaccination status are much more pronounced among Republicans and Republican leaners than among Democrats and Democratic leaners. See the Appendix for more details.

These are among the principal findings from Pew Research Centers survey of 10,348 U.S. adults conducted from Aug. 23 to 29, 2021, on the coronavirus outbreak and Americans views of a COVID-19 vaccine. The survey also finds:

39% say most businesses in the U.S. should require employees to get a COVID-19 vaccine. Another 35% say businesses should encourage employees to get a vaccine, but not require it. A quarter of the public says most businesses should neither require nor encourage employees to get a COVID-19 vaccine. The survey was fielded before President Joe Bidens announcement that employers with more than 100 workers will be required to have their workers vaccinated or tested weekly for the coronavirus.

72% say they personally know someone who has been hospitalized or died from COVID-19. As has been the case throughout the outbreak, larger shares of Black (82%) and Hispanic (78%) adults than White (70%) and English-speaking Asian adults (64%) say they personally know someone who has been hospitalized or died as a result of the coronavirus.

A relatively small share of Americans (26%) are aware that few adults in developing countries have access to COVID-19 vaccines. A majority (76%) places importance on the U.S. providing large numbers of COVID-19 vaccines to developing countries, though just 26% call this a top priority for the U.S.

Bidens job ratings for handling the outbreak have declined. Larger shares now say Joe Biden is doing an only fair or poor job (52%) responding to the coronavirus outbreak than say he is doing an excellent or good job (47%). In February, 54% said he was doing an excellent or good job. By contrast, Americans continue to give very high marks to hospitals and medical centers in their area: 85% say they are doing an excellent or good job responding to the coronavirus outbreak.

Republicans grow more skeptical of scientists judgment. Nearly seven-in-ten Republicans (68%) say scientists judgments are just as likely to be biased as other peoples, up from 55% who said this in January 2019. By contrast, a growing share of Democrats take the opposite view and say scientists make judgments solely on the facts (73% of Democrats say this today, up from 62% in 2019).

A majority of Americans (61%) continue to say the coronavirus outbreak poses a major threat to the health of the U.S. population as a whole. Another 33% say the virus is a minor threat, while just 6% say it is not a threat.

The share that views the coronavirus as a major threat to public health has largely held steady since late March of 2020, following the declaration of a national public health emergency in the U.S. The current share that views the coronavirus as a major threat to public health is about the same as it was in February 2021 (63%), when the country was coming out of a peak of cases and COVID-19-related deaths, and before widespread rollout of the vaccine.

A larger majority of U.S. adults (72%) say the coronavirus outbreak is a major threat to the U.S. economy. This is down slightly from February of this year, when 81% saw the outbreak as a major threat to the economy.

Large partisan divides persist in views of the public health threat posed by COVID-19. Eight-in-ten Democrats and independents who lean toward the Democratic Party say the outbreak is a major threat to the health of the U.S. population, while just 38% of Republicans and Republican leaners say the same. The partisan gap on this question is as wide as it has been at any point during the pandemic.

By contrast, majorities of both Democrats (75%) and Republicans (69%) see the COVID-19 outbreak as a major threat to the countrys economy. While economic concerns remain high, the shares of both parties who see the virus as a serious concern for the economy have moved lower since February, when 83% of Democrats and 81% of Republicans said it was a major threat.

Vaccination status is closely tied to perceptions of the public health threat posed by the coronavirus outbreak: 70% of vaccinated adults view it as a major threat to the health of the U.S. population, compared with just 37% of adults who have not received a vaccine. There is shared concern over the impact on the economy, however: Majorities of both vaccinated (74%) and unvaccinated (67%) adults say the coronavirus poses a major threat to the U.S. economy.

The public continues to rate the job their local hospitals have done responding to the coronavirus very positively; these ratings have been consistently high since the early days of the pandemic. Ratings for President Joe Bidens handling of the outbreak have declined since February and now tilt more negative than positive. Assessments of other groups, including public health officials and state and local elected officials, are steady since February, but remain lower than they were in the early stages of the outbreak.

Overall, 47% say Biden is doing an excellent or good job responding to the coronavirus outbreak, while slightly more (52%) say he is doing an only fair or poor job. Ratings for Biden have declined since February, shortly after he took office, when 54% said he was doing an excellent or good job.

A large majority of Americans (85%) say their hospitals and medical centers are doing an excellent or good job responding to the coronavirus outbreak, identical to the share who said this in February 2021.

Six-in-ten say public health officials, such as those at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), are doing an excellent or good job in their coronavirus response. This rating is lower than it was during the early months of the outbreak, but about the same as it was in February of this year (62%).

A majority of Americans (56%) also say that their local elected officials are doing an excellent or good job responding to the outbreak. A slightly smaller share (50%) rate their state elected officials responses as excellent or good. As with ratings of public health officials, assessments of local and state elected officials are lower than they were early in the outbreak, but are about the same as they were when the questions were last asked six months ago.

Republicans and Democrats share positive assessments of the COVID-19 response from their local hospitals and medical centers but differ widely on the job public health officials and Biden are doing.

Large majorities of Republicans (83%) and Democrats (88%) say hospitals and medical centers in their area are doing an excellent or good job responding to the coronavirus outbreak.

By contrast, a much larger share of Democrats (79%) than Republicans (37%) give positive ratings to the job public health officials, such as those at the CDC, have done responding to the outbreak. Ratings of public health officials among Republicans are down 7 percentage points since February; as a result, the partisan gap in assessments of public health officials has grown even wider (from 35 points to 42 points in the current survey).

Partisan divides are even larger for ratings of Biden. About three-quarters of Democrats (74%) say he is doing an excellent or good job responding to the coronavirus pandemic, compared with just 15% of Republicans a 59-point gap. Ratings of Biden are down among both parties since February, when 84% of Democrats and 20% of Republicans rated his performance highly.

The size of the partisan gap in ratings of Biden is similar to differences seen in ratings of former President Donald Trump at the end of his administration. In February, 71% of Republicans said he did an excellent or good job responding to the pandemic during his time in office, compared with just 7% of Democrats.

There are modest differences between Republicans and Democrats in assessments of how their local and state elected officials are handling the outbreak. Democrats are somewhat more likely than Republicans to rate the job being done by local officials (60% vs. 53%) and state elected officials (55% vs. 45%) as excellent or good.

Thinking about the problems the country is facing from the outbreak, a narrow majority (54%) says they think the worst is still to come, while 45% say the worst is behind us.

Views are more positive than they were in November 2020 before COVID-19 vaccines were approved for use in the U.S. when just 28% of Americans thought the worst was behind us and 71% said the worst was still yet to come.

Republicans and Republican leaners are slightly more optimistic about the state of the outbreak than Democrats and Democratic leaners: 53% of Republicans say the worst is behind us, while 59% of Democrats take the opposing view and think the worst is still to come.

Adults who have received at least one dose of a coronavirus vaccine and those who have not view the state of the coronavirus outbreak in similar terms: 53% of vaccinated and 56% of unvaccinated adults say the worst of the problems from the outbreak are still to come.

Nearly all adults in the U.S. say that coronavirus-related restrictions on public activity have hurt businesses and economic activity either a lot (69%) or some (26%); just 5% say these restrictions have hurt businesses not too much or not at all.

Large shares also say restrictions on public activity have kept people from living their lives the way they want either a lot (58%) or some (31%).

Americans are less convinced of how much the restrictions have helped to prevent hospitalizations and deaths from the coronavirus and helped to slow its spread. Majorities say the restrictions have helped at least some in each regard, but only about three-in-ten say they have done a lot to help prevent hospitalizations and deaths from COVID-19 (32%) or slow the spread of the coronavirus (31%).

Nonetheless, when asked to assess the overall impact of the restrictions on public activity, a majority of Americans (62%) say the public health benefits have been worth the costs; significantly fewer (37%) say they have not been worth the costs.

Vaccinated adults (those who have received at least one dose of a coronavirus vaccine) are less likely than those who have not received a vaccine to say restrictions on public activity have done a lot to hurt businesses and keep people from living their lives, and they are more likely to say restrictions have done a lot to help prevent serious illnesses and slow the viruss spread. For example, 40% of vaccinated adults say restrictions have helped a lot to prevent hospitalizations and deaths from the virus, compared with just 12% of unvaccinated adults who say the same.

These two groups arrive at differing conclusions about the overall impact of the restrictions: 73% of vaccinated adults say the public health benefits of the restrictions have been worth the costs, while 33% of those not vaccinated say this. A majority of those not vaccinated (65%) say the health benefits of the restrictions have not been worth the costs.

There are also wide differences in views of the public health restrictions by partisanship, with Republicans being more likely than Democrats to say the restrictions have had negative impacts, and less likely to say they have helped a lot to prevent severe illnesses and slow the spread of the coronavirus.

As several cities and businesses around the country have begun requiring customers to show proof of COVID-19 vaccination to do things like eat at restaurants or attend concerts, Americans offer mixed views of these requirements, with opinion ranging from majority support to opposition, depending on the setting.

About six-in-ten Americans (61%) say they favor requiring adults in the U.S. to show proof of COVID-19 vaccination before being allowed to travel by airplane, while 38% would oppose such a requirement. While some U.S. airlines have required their employees to get vaccinated, they have so far stopped short of requiring proof of vaccination from travelers although some destinations, such as Hawaii, require visitors to either show proof of vaccination or a negative coronavirus test result, or else quarantine for 10 days after arrival.

As the school year begins around the country, just under six-in-ten Americans (57%) say they favor requiring proof of COVID-19 vaccination for students to attend public colleges and universities in person. More than 800 U.S. colleges are requiring vaccinations for students and staff to be on campus, and more are strongly encouraging vaccination.

A narrow majority of adults (56%) also support requiring proof of COVID-19 vaccination in order to attend sporting events or concerts.

The public is evenly split over whether they would support or oppose being made to show proof of vaccination to eat inside of a restaurant. Some cities, such as New York, have required restaurants and bars to ask for proof of vaccination in response to rising infections and hospitalizations.

On balance, the public leans against requiring proof of vaccination to shop inside stores and businesses: 54% say they are opposed to this, while 45% support such a requirement.

Partisanship, as well as vaccination status, plays a large role in views about requiring coronavirus vaccines. Majorities of Democrats favor requiring adults to show proof of vaccination before doing all five of the activities included in the survey; by contrast, majorities of Republicans oppose each of these measures.

For example, 77% of Democrats and independents who lean toward the Democratic Party favor requiring those going to a sporting event or concert to show proof of vaccination, while 68% of Republicans and Republican leaners oppose requiring spectators to prove theyve received a coronavirus vaccine.

Not surprisingly, adults who have not received a vaccine overwhelmingly oppose requiring proof of vaccination in these settings; roughly eight-in-ten or more oppose each of the five activities requiring proof of vaccination. Among those who have received at least one dose of a vaccine, majorities support requiring proof of vaccination, though the level of support varies from 56% for shopping inside stores and businesses to 77% for travel by airplane.

Differences in views by vaccination status exist within partisan groups. Among Republicans and Republican leaners, 55% of vaccinated Republicans favor requiring proof of vaccination for air travel, compared with 12% of unvaccinated Republicans. Just under half of vaccinated Republicans back proof of vaccination for attending events and public colleges and universities (compared with only about 10% of unvaccinated Republicans). However, when it comes to requirements to eat inside restaurants or shop, majorities of Republicans, regardless of vaccination status, oppose having to provide proof of vaccination. (60% of Republicans and Republican leaners are vaccinated; 38% are not.)

Among Democrats and Democratic leaners, differences are even wider, with majorities of vaccinated Democrats in favor of requiring proof of vaccination in all five settings and majorities of unvaccinated Democrats opposed to all five requirements. However, those who have not received a vaccine represent a small share of all Democrats (14%), compared with 38% among Republicans.

When asked about policies in place in some areas of the country to address the coronavirus outbreak, 80% of Americans say they think it is necessary to require masks for people traveling on airplanes or public transportation. A similar majority (79%) says it is necessary to restrict international travel to the U.S.

About three-quarters of U.S. adults (73%) also think asking people to avoid gathering in large groups is a necessary step to deal with the outbreak.

The public is closely divided on the necessity of two other policies: limiting restaurants to carry-out only (50% necessary, 50% unnecessary) and closing K-12 schools for in-person learning (48% necessary, 51% unnecessary). In-person learning has recently restarted at most schools around the country although some schools have had to temporarily revert to remote instruction due to coronavirus outbreaks among students or staff.

The shares of Americans that support each of these measures have stayed relatively stable since the questions were last asked in February 2021.

Vaccinated adults (including those who have received one of two vaccine doses) are more likely to see each of these five policies as necessary to address the outbreak than adults who have not received a vaccine.

For instance, 82% of vaccinated Americans think it is necessary to ask people to avoid gathering in large groups. About half of unvaccinated adults (49%) say this policy is necessary, while 51% say it is unnecessary.

There also are wide differences in views of policies aimed at addressing the coronavirus outbreak by partisanship, with Democrats expressing significantly more support for each policy than Republicans.

However, the magnitude of the partisan gap varies by policy.

For instance, majorities of Democrats (85%) and Republicans (73%) say its necessary to restrict international travel to the U.S. in order to address the coronavirus outbreak (a 12-point partisan gap).

By contrast, Democrats are far more likely than Republicans to say it is necessary to limit restaurants to carry-out only (68% vs 26%) and to close K-12 schools for in-person learning (67% vs. 25%).

Public health guidance on mask wearing has changed over the course of the outbreak, and policies requiring masks or preventing mask requirements have varied widely at the state and local level.

In the current survey, 53% of adults say that in the past month they have worn a mask or face covering all or most of the time when in stores and businesses; 21% say they have worn one some of the time and 25% say theyve worn a mask in these public places hardly ever or never.

The share of U.S. adults who say theyve been wearing a mask all or most of the time is down 35 points since February, when mask mandates were more widely in place around the country than they are today. The decline in frequent mask wearing has been much greater among Republicans (down 53 points) than among Democrats (down 22 points). In February, there was a modest partisan divide on this question as large majorities of both Republicans (83%) and Democrats (93%) said they had been wearing a mask all or most of the time in public. Today, the partisan gap has grown dramatically to 41 points as Democrats are now far more likely than Republicans to report wearing a mask all or most of the time when in stores and businesses (71% vs. 30%).

Vaccinated adults are significantly more likely than those who have not received a COVID-19 vaccine to report frequently wearing a mask in public places.

About six-in-ten (59%) of those who have received at least one dose of a vaccine say they have been wearing a mask all or most of the time in stores and businesses over the last month. A much smaller share (37%) of those who have not received a COVID-19 vaccine report this level of mask wearing; 45% of this group say they have been wearing a mask in stores and businesses hardly ever or never in the last month.

There is a strong link between personal concern about getting a serious case of the coronavirus and mask wearing. Eight-in-ten of those who are very concerned about getting the coronavirus and requiring hospitalization say theyve been wearing a mask all or most of the time in stores and businesses. The share who report frequent mask wearing falls to 64% among those who are somewhat concerned about getting a serious case of the coronavirus and to 38% among those who are not too or not at all about getting the coronavirus and requiring hospitalization.

Mask-wearing habits also differ significantly by the type of community where people live. Nearly seven-in-ten adults who live in urban areas (68%) say theyve been wearing a mask all or most of the time in stores and businesses, compared with 51% of those in suburban areas and 42% of those in rural areas.

A majority of Americans say they are either very (27%) or somewhat (32%) concerned that they might spread the coronavirus to other people without knowing that they have it. A smaller share (45%) say they are very (19%) or somewhat (26%) concerned that they will get the coronavirus and require hospitalization.

Concern over getting and unknowingly spreading the coronavirus has gradually edged lower since the start of the pandemic. In April 2020, 66% of U.S. adults were at least somewhat concerned about unknowingly spreading the coronavirus (including 33% who were very concerned); at that time, 55% were at least somewhat concerned about getting a serious case themselves (24% very concerned).

There are wide differences in levels of concern over getting and spreading the coronavirus by vaccination status as well as by other characteristics such as party affiliation and race and ethnicity.

About two-thirds of vaccinated adults are very (31%) or somewhat (35%) concerned about unknowingly spreading COVID-19 to others. Half are at least somewhat concerned about getting a serious case themselves. By contrast, among those who have not received a vaccine, fewer than half express concern about unknowingly spreading the coronavirus (38%) or getting a serious case themselves (32%), including relatively small shares who say they are very concerned about this (16% and 13%, respectively).

Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents are far more likely than Republicans and Republican leaners to say they are very or somewhat concerned about spreading the coronavirus to other people without knowing they have it (76% vs. 38%) and to say they are concerned about getting a serious case of the coronavirus themselves (56% vs. 30%).

White adults are much less likely than Black, Hispanic and English-speaking Asian adults to express concern over spreading the coronavirus or getting the coronavirus and requiring hospitalization. Eight-in-ten English-speaking Asian adults, 73% of Hispanic adults and 65% of Black adults say they are very or somewhat concerned about unknowingly spreading the coronavirus to others, compared with 52% of White adults.

Among White adults, Democrats are far more likely than Republicans to express concern about getting or spreading COVID-19. For instance, nearly three-quarters of White Democrats (74%) say they are very or somewhat concerned about unknowingly spreading the coronavirus, compared with 35% of White Republicans. (Overall, larger shares of White adults than Black, Hispanic and English-speaking Asian adults identify with or lean toward the Republican Party.)

Strong confidence in the vaccine research and development process has risen steadily over the past year. The share saying they have a great deal of confidence that the research and development process has produced safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines has increased 20 percentage points (to 39%) over the past year and is up 6 points since February.

Read this article:

Majority in U.S. Says Public Health Benefits of COVID-19 Restrictions Worth the Costs, Even as Large Shares Also See Downsides - Pew Research Center

Page 460«..1020..459460461462..470480..»